Mohawk, South Fayette divers win WPIAL Class AA titles
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Once McKenzie Stelter finished her 11th and final dive at the WPIAL Class AA finals, she climbed out of the pool and realized her score of 43.20 was enough to move her into first place.
Then the Mohawk junior spent an excruciating few minutes waiting for Moon's Heather Lonkert to step on the board at South Park High School and complete her repertoire.
“It was really, really rough,” Stelter said. “I would like to go first in that situation to put the pressure on her, but it was just the luck of the draw, I guess.”
Lonkert executed her reverse one-and-a-half somersault, but her 38.85 points on the 2.1 degree of difficulty dive wasn't enough to reclaim the lead as Stelter became the first Mohawk diver to win a WPIAL Class AA title. Stelter, whose reverse one somersault with one-and-a-half twists has a degree of difficulty of 2.4, finished with 419.85 points, while Lonkert came in second with 417.65.
“It was so stressful,” Stelter said. “I looked up at the board after Heather did her 10th dive, and I knew it was really tight. I knew coming in that Heather was my competition, and I knew I had to my best on that dive.”
Stelter finished third last season behind champion Maria Lohman of Chartiers Valley and Katie Dunst of Trinity, but neither was at the Class AA meet this year. Biennial realignment pushed Chartiers Valley and Lohman, a sophomore, into Saturday's Class AAA finals at North Allegheny, while Dunst graduated.
Lonkert, who finished third in Class AAA in 2012, had a score of 378.80 after 10 dives and led Stelter by 2.15 heading into the final round.
“It just came down to the degree of difficulty,” Lonkert said.
Close calls are nothing new to Stephen Zombek, who went into his final dive in the Class AA boys finals with a lot on his mind. Not only did he have to concentrate on a back dive with a somersault and two-and-a-half twists with a 2.7 degree of difficulty, he had to put the memory of the 2012 finals out of his mind.
It didn't help that Beaver's Micah Ringer was only 9.85 points behind with a dive remaining. Even after he finished and opened a 49-point lead, he couldn't relax.
“I was definitely worried that maybe he would get straight 7.5s and maybe pass me up,” Zombek said.
Ringer scored 38.40 points on a forward dive with two-and-a-half somersaults, which gave the South Fayette junior the school's first WPIAL Class AA diving title with a final score of 353.25.
“I had a really bad meet compared to how I've done throughout the season,” Zombek said. “Half my dives were off, but my twisters saved me, so it helped to know that back twister was there at the end.”
Ringer, who finished fifth in 2012, outscored Zombek in rounds nine and 10, but could not close the deficit.
“It was my last dive, and I knew I'd have to hit it to be able to have a chance,” Ringer said. “I did what I was taught to do, I hit it, I just didn't win.”
In 2012, Zombek had a failed dive in the eighth round that eventually cost him a title in one of the most competitive finals in recent history. South Park's Billy Rountree — who opted against defending his title this season — won the championship with a 301.60 final score. Zombeck was second at 301.45.
“This means everything in the world,” Zombek said. “Going into this year I decided that I didn't want to regret anything and I had a lot of motivation from last year.”
The top nine finishers in the WPIAL Class AA finals advance to the PIAA meet at Bucknell University's Kinney Natatorium on March 13-14.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.