Pine-Richland swimmers advance to PIAAs
It's back to the state championship swimming meet for Pine-Richland's Kristen and Allison Murslack.
Kristen qualified to swim in the 200 IM and 100 breaststroke by capturing the gold medal in the WPIAL championships, and Allison took silver in the 500 freestyle event.
“The wins shows how far I have come,” Kristen Murslack said. “I learned a lot and wanted to go out strong, so it feels good to win both events my senior year.”
Kristen Murslack had to overcome some adversity to finish strong. She battled illness, a concussion and an elbow injury during the season, but overcame it all.
“We will stick to the gameplan for states,” she said. “We will go up a couple thousand yards in practice and then taper.
“This means a lot, and to win four in a row, I owe a lot to my teammates and coaches,” Kristen Murslack said.
Allison Murslack said the 500 freestyle is tough because it is a long race, but because she has participated in it since starting with her club team, she is used to the rigors.
“I try to get out to a fast start and then find a good pace,” Allison Murslack said. “If you push yourself too much or too fast, you will end up dying.”
The opportunity to go to states with her sister is one not many get, according to Allison Murslack, and her goal is to represent her school well and place at the meet.
“We will see some new competition, but we will keep our normal training,” Allison Murslack said. “A lot of it is mental at this point; the physical work already is done.”
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.