Charleroi's Simpson just misses gold in 50 yards
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Luke Simpson recorded a personal best time of 21.29 seconds in the 50-yard event, but came up one-tenth of a second behind Beaver Area senior Cameron Clerici in the WPIAL Class AA swimming championships Thursday at Pitt's Trees Pool and earned the silver medal.
“It is kind of mixed feelings because I had two goals but only reached one,” Simpson said.
“I am proud of (the silver medal) and I got my best time. But not winning the gold, it gives me more motivation to work for with the states.”
Simpson qualified for the PIAA championships with his finish. The state event will take place March 13-16 at Bucknell University.
Although Simpson came up less than a blink from winning the gold, he blew away his personal best time of 21.52 last year at the YMCA District Tournament at Chartiers Valley High School.
Simpson has one more chance at gold today in the 100-yard backstroke.
He is seeded 16th, but the WPIAL did not use his best time to factor in the seeds.
“I should do really well in that heat,” he said.
Elizabeth Forward and Yough also saw swimmers finish in the top five of their respective meets with EF senior Braelyn Tracy winning gold in the girls' 200 freestyle with a time of 1:51.94.
Tracy wasn't done as she teamed with junior Mary Cooper and sophomores Cheyenne Cleveland and Ciara Lewis to finish fifth in the girls' 200-yard freestyle relay with a time of 1:42.83.
The EF quartet of seniors Andrew Ferrington and Josh Kreig and juniors Kameron Faychak and Marshall Grubb finished second in the boys' 200-yard medley relay.
Krieg also took fifth in the boys 100-yard butterfly with a time of 52.41 seconds.
Yough freshman Jessica Cochran took fifth in the girls 100-yard butterfly with a time of 59.67 seconds.
Bill Hughes is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.