SSA swim teams strong at WPIAL meet
From left are Andrew Lehman, Thad Ellis, Ryan Koul and Brendan Leech, members of the 200 Free Relay team. Submitted
Photo by The Herald
The Shady Side Academy swim team got off to a strong start on Friday at the WPIAL Class AA championships at Trees Pool.
For the boys, Brendan Leech finished fourth in the 200 freestyle and qualified for the PIAA championships.
The 200 freestyle relay team of Thad Ellis, Leech, Andrew Lehman and Ryan Koul took first place and Ellis also qualified for the state meet with a fifth-place finish in the 50 freestyle.
On the girls side, the 200 medley relay team of Karen Shi, Emily Jaffe, Destin Groff and Ali Sarner finished fourth and moved on to states.
Caroline Colville finished seventh in the 200 freestyle while Groff was a qualifier with her third-place finish in the 100 butterfly.
SSA's success continued on Saturday.
For the boys, Ellis qualified in the 100 freestyle with a third-place finish.
The 400 free relay team (Ellis, Leech, Lehman, Koul) advanced with a second-place finish. Overall, the boys team finished fifth in the standings.
For the girls on Saturday, Groff qualified for states in the 100 freestyle with a fourth-place finish while Colville finished fifth in the 500 freestyle.
The 400 free relay team finished sixth. The girls ended up in fifth in the team standings.
“Our meet was a strong one,” SSA coach John Landreth said. “I thought we would have to swim well to be top-5 at the beginning of the season, and that is what happened. We had some excellent individual swims from Destin, Thad, Caroline and Brendan, but our relays have not peaked yet. So that is what we are looking forward to at the state meet.”
The PIAA championships will be held at Bucknell University from March 13 to 16.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.