Fox Chapel swim teams shine at WPIALs
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The WPIAL Class AAAA swimming championships were held on Thursday and Friday at Pitt's Trees Pool.
On Friday, Fox Chapel's Noah Cagley finished sixth in the 200 freestyle with a time of 1:44.64. The winning time was 1:41.86.
In the 200 individual medley, the Foxes' Scott Sterrett finished fourth at 1:54.54. The third-place finisher was .12 seconds faster than Sterrett.
In Saturday's action, Cagley finished fifth in the 500 freestyle while Sterrett came in sixth in the 100 breaststroke.
Zihan Su finished seventh in the 100 backstroke. Overall, the boys finished sixth in the team standings with 141 points.
In girls action on Saturday, FC's Franny Dean finished fourth in the 500 freestyle.
Sia Beasley came in seventh in the 100 backstroke. The girls ended up in ninth place.
All told, the Foxes had 15 swimmers entered. They were Kelly Ariel, Beasley, Alexis Boyd, Maura Clark, Dean, Claire McCarthy, Anna Mucci and Amanda Todd for the girls; and Cagley, Sterrett, Zu, Dante Cordaro, Travis Eckman, Ryan Foster and Andrew Siar for the boys.
The Foxes set eight new team records at the meet.
Dean set a record in the 100 breaststroke while the boys broke records in seven events.
Setting school marks were: the 200 medley relay team of Su, Cordaro, Sterrett and Cagley; the 400 freestyle relay team of Cagley, Su, Sterrett and Foster; Cagley in the 100 and 200 freestyle; Sterrett in the 200 IM and 100 breaststroke; and Su in the 100 backstroke.
Dean, Beasley, Cagley, Su, Sterrett, Cordaro and divers Miranda Simon and Emily Eames will represent Fox Chapel at the PIAA AAA swimming and diving championships March 13 to 16 at Bucknell University.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.