Geibel's Zimcosky settles for victory in consolation finals
TribLIVE Sports Videos
LEWISBURG — Geibel freshman Emily Zimcosky was hoping to win a heat at the PIAA Class AA championship meet.
Only she was kind of hoping to do it way before it actually happened.
Zimcosky took first place in the consolation finals of the 200-yard freestyle with a time of 1 minute, 52.94 seconds to finish ninth at the state finals at Bucknell University's Kinney Natatorium.
“Having this new experience and being separated from my time, I think it got to me and my nerves,” Zimcosky said. “Coming to a big meet like this and seeing big names, it kind of got to my head.”
Zimcosky finished second to Elizabeth Forward senior Braelyn Tracy in the event at the WPIAL Class AA finals at Pitt's Trees Pool on Feb. 28, with a time of 1:52.69, but she swam a 1:54.88 in the morning qualifiers.
That put her nearly a second behind Moon senior Alexis Mitcheltree for the eighth and final slot in the championship heat.
Despite the improvement from the morning to the evening, her time would have been good enough to finish sixth in the finals — she did not earn a medal because she did not compete in the championship heat. That knowledge, though, will serve her well as she prepares to compete in the 100 freestyle on Thursday in the second and final day of the Class AA meet.
“You just want to get into your suit, get the right amount of yards in and talk to your coach,” Zimcosky said. “It's all time-management.”
While Zimcosky struggled off the blocks, Tracy just didn't feel comfortable in her races. Though she did win a medal — she was fifth with a time of 1:52.84 — her time was we'll above the personal-best 1:51.94 that led to a gold medal at the WPIAL meet.
“I don't know what happened,” Tracy said. “I did phenomenal at WPIALs and was happy with how I did there, but I just didn't feel fast in the pool.”
She would have had a hard time winning a state title, as junior Adriana Grabski broke Bloomsburg's Stef Williams' 1998 record (1:47.37) in the event with a time of 1:47.05. But after going into the meet as the No. 2 seed and swimming just a 1:53.59 in the morning qualifier, Tracy's disappointment was obvious.
“In the morning I felt fast, but I just had a God-awful time,” Tracy said. “At night my time was a little faster, but I just felt slower. My body kind of hurt while I was swimming, but I still felt high in the water.”
Laurel Highlands senior Justin Kostelnik qualified for the final of the 100 butterfly as the No. 8 seed, then swam a 52.11 in the final to finish sixth.
Greensburg Salem senior Daniel Yu had a similar experience to his 2012 appearance. Yu failed to qualify for the final heat of the 50 freestyle, then won the consolation race.
“I feel a sense of déjà-vu and I'm just obviously not in as good shape as I was last year,” Yu said. “But it's been a great ride.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.