ShareThis Page

Elizabeth Forward swimmer takes 5th at PIAA meet

| Thursday, March 14, 2013, 10:36 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Tailb Zanna is defended by Syracuse's Rakeem Christmas during the first half of their Big East Tournament quarterfinal game Thursday, March 14, 2013, at Madison Square Garden in New York.
Dan Gleiter |
West Mifflin's Brad Kolesar competes in the PIAA Class AA 100-yard backstroke consolation finals Thursday, March 14, 2013, at Bucknell University's Kinney Natatorium.

LEWISBURG — Elizabeth Forward's Braelyn Tracy needed to lean on the people around her after she finished what was, in her mind, a disappointing and emotionally draining PIAA Class AA championship meet at Bucknell University's Kinney Natatorium.

“I think it's just an emotional day with my last high school race, and I was frustrated that I had added time,” Tracy said. “I did just swim a week-and-a-half ago, and I did have a phenomenal WPIAL (meet) and had my two best times and I got two gold medals, so there's really nothing I should be upset about right now.”

Tracy, who won WPIAL titles in both the 200 and 500 freestyle, finished fifth in the PIAA 500 freestyle with a time of 5:01.13. She captured the WPIAL championship in the event March 1 with a 4:59.53 — the only swimmer to break five minutes.

Her small time balloon in the 500 freestyle might have gone by the wayside had it not been for an equally frustrating end to the 200 freestyle on Wednesday, when Tracy finished in 1:52.84, above the personal-best 1:51.94 she posted at the WPIAL meet.

After a while, though, she started to put things into perspective.

“So I didn't get one best time. There's so many kids that got sent home because they didn't make finals, and I was on the podium my junior and senior year and I got two gold medals at WPIALs my senior year,” Tracy said. “Everybody is screaming and there's adrenaline and it's great for all the people that are here to experience that.”

Tracy is still deciding between attending California (Pa.) University and Toledo to continue her swimming career next year.

“I'm going to take to college what I saw at states,” Tracy said. “There are a lot of kids that are here for one event and don't even make finals, and I just really experienced a lot.”

West Mifflin junior Brad Kolesar finished ninth in the preliminaries of the 100 backstroke Thursday and had to settle for swimming in a consolation heat.

Despite the fact he won to officially finish ninth (54.07), it was little solace even though he did move up a spot in the standings, entering as the 10th seed.

“It's a rough meet,” Kolesar said. “I know I was seeded 10th going in, and I didn't look at my times in the prelims, but this is pretty hard. I didn't get my best times. It was real frustrating and, after the meet, I kind of beat myself up a little bit.”

Kolesar swam the 100 backstroke in 54 seconds, which missed the final by 0.27 seconds. On Wednesday, Kolesar did garner a medal as he finished fifth in the 100 butterfly with a time of 51.32 seconds.

“Finishing top eight and winning a medal, it would have been nice going home with two medals this year,” Kolesar said. “I just had to win the consols. I wish I could have been a little faster, but I can't complain about it.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.