Share This Page

Latrobe girls cap impressive opening day at PIAA swim championships

| Friday, March 15, 2013, 8:48 p.m.
Mark Pynes | mpynes@pennlive.com
Latrobe's Kayla Owens competes in the girls 200 IM at the PIAA Class AAA swimming and diving championships Friday, March 15, 2013, at Kinney Natatorium at Bucknell University in Lewisburg, Pa.

LEWISBURG — Latrobe's Kayla Owens has been in the pool enough times against Pine-Richland senior Kristen Murslack that she had a solid game plan to take her on at the PIAA Class AAA championships.

“I was really excited,” Owens said. “When they're far in front of me, I know that I have to pick it up and keep in front of them. I know I can't keep up with all of them, obviously, but it really helps me when it starts to get hard during a race.”

Granted it may not initially sound like good advice, but it certainly worked for the Latrobe junior, who swam a personal best time of 2:03.11 in the 200-yard individual medley to finish third behind Emily Cameron of Warwick (2:00.62) and Murslack's 2:01.53.

Owens finished second to Murslack in the WPIAL Class AAA finals at Pitt's Trees Pool on Feb. 28 when she lost by 3.1 seconds (2:05.09) in the last heat of the timed finals.

“She's incredible and she's really good to swim against,” Owens said. “She really helps me push myself, especially at these high-level meets.”

Even though Owens felt the pressure of being in the pool with a pair Division I swimmers — Murslack has committed to Auburn while Cameron will swim at Georgia — she reaped the benefits, moving up two spots from having the fifth-highest qualifying time among competitors as taken from the district finals and the fourth-fastest time in the morning qualifiers (2:04.70).

“I really know my hard work paid off,” Owens said. “I'm really happy.”

She wasn't the only one on her team smiling after Friday's first day of competition in the two-day meet. As a whole, Latrobe fared well and is tied with Franklin Regional for sixth in the overall standings despite not having a team in the 200 freestyle relay.

“We're really excited, especially considering how hard it is for the WPIAL teams to do well at the states,” Latrobe first-year coach Grey Arrigonie said. “With some of the places we're getting, you can't be more impressed or happy with that.”

Latrobe opened the day by finishing fourth among the fastest 200 medley relays in state history. Hershey won the race with a state-record time of 1:42.22, a time that just beat North Allegheny, which also beat the previous state record with a 1:42.25.

Franklin Regional and Latrobe got into a Section 1 battle to the wire that the Panthers team of Alyssa Ruffing, Samantha Tower, Rachel Barkey and Kaitlyn Ruffing won by 0.01 seconds. They clocked in at 1:47.18, while the Wildcats foursome of Madeline Hoopes, Owens, Gina DeFrancesco and Monica Sowinski touched the wall in 1:47.19.

“That was great for the team because it gets contagious when you start swimming that fast,” Arrigonie said. “Everything is kind of going perfect right now.”

Sowinski also won the consolation race in the 200 freestyle with a solid time of 1:51.67, which would have given her a seventh-place finish in the finals heat.

After their opening day performances, the Wildcats are optimistic heading into Saturday's competition.

“We just have to keep telling them how well we're doing,” Arrigonie said. “Our team at dual meets and WPIALs, our best is the back half and this is setting up for us to do pretty well.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at kbarnes@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.