Fox Chapel junior Beasley medals at PIAA swimming
TribLIVE Sports Videos
LEWISBURG — Fox Chapel junior Sia Beasley only qualified for the state in one event, the 100-yard backstroke, so she had a lot of time to put all her energy into making it pay off.
She couldn't have done it much better.
Beasley moved up six spots from her 13th place qualifying slot and into the medal round in the morning preliminary heats, then finished her day with a solid time of 57.12 seconds for a seventh-place finish at the PIAA Class AAA finals Saturday at Bucknell University's Kinney Natatorium.
“I did a lot of short sprinting strokes and kicking to prepare,” Beasley said.
“And it's a really nice pool. I love it.”
Some of the best swimmers in the WPIAL would likely disagree after several of the top seeds dropped out of title contention. But it's hard to argue with her assessment after what Beasley did in the pool.
Because of her seed, she stepped up onto the blocks in the final heat in Lane 2, which is usually not a place from which swimmers get qualifying times.
In addition, she was in the race with eventual state champion Christina Leander of West Chester East, WPIAL runner-up Meghan Schilken of Mt. Lebanon and District 6 champion Anna Farnsworth from State College.
“I was really excited to swim this morning,” Beasley said. “I had a best time at WPIALs, and I wanted to improve on that.”
Unfortunately, she didn't quite get there.
Beasley swam her four laps in 57.49 seconds, which was 0.02 seconds slower than her WPIAL time. But it didn't matter as she was able to sneak into the final as the last qualifier.
What made her reaching the final even more impressive was the fact she didn't initially qualify for the state championships.
Beasley finished seventh in the WPIAL, which had only three automatic qualifiers into the state meet, and she had to wait a couple of days until after the other PIAA district meets were over before she was informed she had earned an at-large spot at the meet.
From there, all she had to do was once again go up against several of the top swimmers in the state, including WPIAL champion Jacquelyn Du of North Allegheny.
And instead of folding under the weight of all the talent around her, she moved up from an eighth seed to seventh place with a personal best time.
“I didn't do anything differently,” Beasley said. “I just wanted to swim like I did in the morning.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.