Quaker Valley diver makes quick study
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Reilly Diggins is off to an impressive start as a freshman on the Quaker Valley girls swimming and diving team.
Diggins was undefeated in 1-meter diving in two of three Section 2-AA meets so far. Her only loss came last week, when she finished second to Riverside's Brittany Hart, a finalist at the WPIAL championship a year ago.
Diggins also took first place at the West Allegheny Christmas Invitational meet.
“Reilly gets a little more polished every week,” coach Sue Morgan said. “It's been a pleasure to watch.”
Led in part by Diggins and other divers, Quaker Valley (2-1) is considered a strong contender for the section title. The Quakers were scheduled to meet Blackhawk on Wednesday. Results were not available before this edition's deadline.
Senior Olivia Ragoowansi and sophomore Becca Kirby finished second and fourth, respectively, in 1-meter diving at the West Allegheny Christmas Invitational.
Freshman Marissa Brooks has competed, as well.
Morgan expects Diggins, 15, to improve greatly with experience.
“One thing that's posed a problem for her is (learning) the difference between USA Diving and national high school rules,” Morgan said. “There are some things allowed in USA Diving that aren't (allowed) in high school.
“Once she gets a handle on that, there will be no stopping her.”
Doe Krug, her coach at the Pitt Aquatic Club, said Diggins is very graceful.
“She's a petite girl with a beautiful toe point,” said Krug, noting Diggins is learning more difficult dives.
Diggins took up diving after a chronic pain condition triggered by a shin injury forced her to quit gymnastics.
“I had to keep from getting reinjured,” said Diggins, who finds diving easier on the legs.
Diggins has modest goals this year.
“I'd like to be a medalist at WPIALs so I can qualify for (the state championship),” Diggins said.
Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.