ShareThis Page

Norwin's Santilli advances to PIAA tennis semifinals

| Friday, Nov. 3, 2017, 7:12 p.m.

Norwin senior Maria Santilli is a step closer to defending her PIAA Class AAA singles tennis championship.

After cruising to a pair of straight-sets victories Friday in the opening rounds of the state tournament in Hershey, Santilli will take on North Allegheny's Ashley Huang in the semifinals Saturday morning.

Santilli, the two-time WPIAL champion, lost just one game in her two matches Friday.

Huang, the WPIAL's third-place finisher, won both of her matches in straight sets.

The winner moves on to the championship at 1 p.m.

In Class AAA doubles, the defending state champion tandem of Amanda Nord and Charlotte James from Fox Chapel advanced to the semifinals with a pair of straight-sets victories. They will play Central Bucks East's Sydney Lund and Haylie Laff in the semifinals. Pine-Richland's Melissa Vizcardo and Alyssa Sarver advanced to the other semifinal with two straight-sets wins.

Knoch's Laura Greb, the WPIAL champion, advanced to the Class AA semifinals and will play at 11 a.m. Saturday.

In Class AA doubles, WPIAL champions Kelsey Heckert and Lauren Bertig from Indiana and Beaver's Devyn Campbell and Sydni Lewis also advanced to the semifinals. With victories, they will face each other in the 3 p.m. finals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.