Fox Chapel boys tennis has high expectations
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Last year, the Fox Chapel Area High School boys tennis team finished second in the section and made it to the WPIAL quarterfinals.
Despite losing some key seniors and seeing one of his top singles players move out of state, coach Dave Prevost is optimistic.
“I think we can do the playoffs this year,” Prevost said. “We still have some question marks but we have some strengths that will help lead to a good season.”
The team's main strength will be at singles.
“We're very solid in singles. We'll hold our own,” Prevost said.
Leading the way will be senior Ben Short who returns at No. 1 singles.
“He had some injury problems last year,” Prevost said. “We'll be watching his shoulder and hoping that he has a strong year.”
Junior Josh Lehman returns at singles along with senior Kathik Narayanan.
Freshman Sid Rajupet has also been impressive so far, along with juniors Patrick Campbell and Taha El-Magbri.
Prevost said that the next few weeks will determine what the lineup will look like.
“We have to work on finding some good doubles combinations,” he said. “There are a lot of JV players from last year who were occasional starters. We had 32 players try out for the team. Usually, we get about 40 but we have some talent in this year's turnout.
“We have some non-section matches coming up and we will use them as an opportunity to see who will be playing where and what JV players we will be moving up.”
Prevost expects another tough section battle.
“As usual, Shady Side Academy will be loaded,” Prevost said.
Central Catholic didn't lose anybody so they will be a strong team. Things look good for us and the team is ready to go.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.