The Shady Side Academy tennis team made it to the state finals last year before falling to Conestoga.
SSA coach Tom Mercer believes that this year's edition has what it takes to make a strong run at states, again.
“We lost our No. 1 player, Vivek Nimgaonkar, but we've got everybody else back,” Mercer said. “Vivek's brother, Alok, will move into the top slot and he's a pretty good player.”
Nimgaonkar, a senior, will team up with sophomores Eric and Chris Grubbs at singles with a pair of promising freshmen — cousins Cooper and Michael Kann — also in the mix.
Junior Henry Cohen will play at doubles with three more sophomores — Sahil Bahri, Naveen Jain and Brad Steiner — also expected to contribute.
“It hurts to lose Vivek but we have the balance and depth to make up for it,” Mercer said. “Our freshmen are really strong players.
“We have a lot of combinations that we can use and we are experienced. Everybody from last year's team is a year older and a year better.”
Mercer expects the section battle to once again come down SSA and Fox Chapel.
“We appear to be the top two teams on paper,” Mercer said. “Central Catholic has the best player in the WPIAL coming back in Adam Blizinsky so they will be tough at No. 1 singles.
“Overall, in the WPIAL, Mt. Lebanon and Upper St. Clair will be very strong.
“All in all, I think we can make it back to states. We have a nice blend of experience and talented newcomers and we expect to have a strong season.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.