ShareThis Page

Valley's Schrecongost gets serious about tennis career

| Monday, April 15, 2013, 12:31 a.m.
Valley's Cody Schrecongost returns a backhand against Burrell's Tom Spagnolo during their WPIAL Section 4-AA championship match Tuesday, April 9, 2013, at Valley High School in New Kensington.
Eric Felack | Valley News DIspatch
Valley's Cody Schrecongost returns a backhand against Burrell's Tom Spagnolo during their WPIAL Section 4-AA championship match Tuesday, April 9, 2013, at Valley High School in New Kensington.

When Valley boys tennis coach Rachael Link notices a text message on her phone from junior Cody Schrecongost, she rarely needs to read it.

Link knows it's likely a request from her standout singles player: Please show up at the court for a hitting session.

A year-round devotee to the sport for the first time, Schrecongost, who started playing tennis as a freshman, might soon become one of Valley's most decorated players. He's already a two-time Section 4-AA champion. On Monday, he'll enter the WPIAL singles championships at Keystone Oaks as a serious contender for a title — or at least a spot in the PIAA tournament. The top three finishers advance to states.

“The evolution of Cody is remarkable,” Link said. “And all of the fruits he's seeing now with his success are because of his diligence and determination on the court.

“He doesn't want (to hit) just at practice. He knows he needs to work outside of practice. He's learned all of the different components to be not just a good tennis player but a competitive player in the WPIAL, and he's done it at a remarkable pace.”

Schrecongost, a WPIAL quarterfinalist as a sophomore, enters the 2013 tournament as the No. 2 seed after a dominant section showing last week in which he lost just three games. He defeated Burrell junior Tom Spagnolo, 6-1, 6-0, in the finals.

In eight years as coach of the boys and girls teams, Link has seen her share of decisive victories at the section level. She knows the WPIAL presents considerably tougher challenges, which is why, though she has had many standouts, she's never watched one qualify for a PIAA berth. Courtney Brennan came close in 2012 when she placed fourth.

Because of his almost daily tennis play during the summer and his work with David Bender at the Pittsburgh Indoor Tennis Club in East Liberty during the winter, Schrecongost might possess the skills to break through where Valley predecessors fell short.

“He has not only the ability but the desire to get there,” said Bender, who also coaches at Keystone Oaks. “I think he is pretty well grounded and understands who he is as a player.

“He makes players beat themselves. That's the No. 1 thing about him.”

Schrecongost admitted he's not the type to impose his will from the start of a match. Instead, he gets a sense of his opponent's strengths and weaknesses. Then, with his excellent foot speed and well-rounded racquet skills, the righty picks apart the foe.

That's how his WPIAL first-round match with Ellwood City's Matt Barnes unfolded last season. Schrecongost and Barnes traded points until they were tied at 5. Then Schrecongost proceeded to win the next five points to end the match.

Against Hampton's Brad Cisek in the quarterfinals, Schrecongost struggled to find and exploit weaknesses. He lost, 10-3.

A talented soccer player and swimmer, he still found time during the tennis offseason to get on the court and hit. Only during the soccer season did he set the racquet aside completely.

“I wanted to be serious for tennis this year, so I started focusing on it during the winter,” he said.

His progress during the past year, the product of his year-round dedication, caught him by surprise.

“I didn't think I was going to be as good as I am right now,” he said. “I think I've become less conservative. I've gotten more confidence in myself as the season has gone on.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.