Penn-Trafford junior Price falls in first round at WPIAL singles tournament
Penn-Trafford junior Cullen Price plays in the first round of the WPIAL Class AAA singles championships Monday, April 15, 2013, at Shady Side Academy.
Photo by Jan Pakler | For The Penn-Trafford Star
For the third straight year, Cullen Price's run at the WPIAL singles tournament ended in the first round.
The Penn-Trafford junior lost, 10-5, to fourth-seeded Mitch Kreider of Peters Township in the first round of the WPIAL singles champonship Monday at Shady Side Academy.
“I got down early, 7-0, but at that time I started to find my groove a little bit,” Price said. “I guess it was too little, too late.”
Price advanced to the WPIAL singles tournament for the third straight year after finishing second at last week's Section 1-AAA tournament.
Price qualified for the WPIAL singles tournament in his first two seasons at Penn-Trafford. Both times, he lost in the first round to eventual champion Will Nesbitt.
“At the WPIAL level, there's very, very high-level tennis,” Penn-Trafford tennis coach Linda Michaux said. “Cullen did very well. I believe the match could have gone either way.”
While Monday's match ended in disappointment, Price will compete in the Section 1 doubles tournament beginning Monday at Franklin Regional.
Price won the tournament playing with Chris Price in 2011 and finished second alongside Paul Campbell last season. He will be paired with senior Alec Giugliano this season.
Penn-Trafford, the two-time defending section champion, stood at 10-0 on the season heading into a section match Wednesday against Kiski Area. The match ended too late for this week's edition.
“We've been great this year, and we're looking to win the section (and) get that three-peat,” Price said.
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.