Fox Chapel wraps up successful boys tennis season
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The season ended for the Fox Chapel High School tennis team on May 6 as it fell to North Allegheny, 4-1, in the WPIAL Class AAA team championships.
Coach Dave Prevost's team ended up at 14-5 and he was pleased with how the season went.
“I think we exceeded expectations,” Prevost said. “Finishing second in the section behind a very good Shady Side Academy team had to be considered a success.
“We had a very young team with only two seniors — Ben Short and Karthik Narayanan. Our young players, of which we had many, had a lot of talent.”
Prevost said everybody on the roster improved during the course of the season.
“That didn't surprise me,” he said. “I expected them to improve. We will have a lot of talented, experienced players coming up and I expect that we will be very competitive for the next few years.”
The key for next season, Prevost said, is seeing who can step up and replace Short at No. 1 singles.
“He'll be tough to replace,” Prevost said. “But, again, everybody improved during the season and I expect them to improve during the offseason.
“We're all looking forward to next year.”
While the team is looking forward to next year, two players —Short and Sid Rajupet — still have some work to do this season.
By virtue of their second-place finish at the WPIAL Class AAA doubles tournament, they will be heading to Hershey on May 24 and 25 to compete in the PIAA AAA doubles championships.
“They played well at WPIAL's and I expect that they will put on a good performance at states,” Prevost said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.