ShareThis Page

WPIAL champion Blazinsky reaches PIAA tennis semifinals

| Friday, May 24, 2013, 9:18 p.m.

HERSHEY — Every year there are matches in the first couple of rounds of the state singles tournament that call into question the PIAA decision to pre-seed the bracket by district rather than by USTA ranking.

Central Catholic junior Adam Blazinsky, the WPIAL Class AAA champion and No. 6 junior in the state according to the Website, found himself embroiled in one of those better-suited-for-later-in-the-bracket matches in the quarterfinals against No. 3 senior and Penn State recruit Christian Lutschaunig of La Salle College High School.

After the two slugged it out for nearly two hours Friday, Blasinsky came away with a 7-6 (8-6), 6-4 victory to move into the PIAA Class AAA semifinals at 11 a.m. Saturday against Freedom (District 11) sophomore Andrew Sinai.

“I'm used to (hard-hitting matches), because I train with (Pine-Richland alum) Casey Watt,” Blasinsky said. “He went to Notre Dame and multiple states, and he hits the ball pretty hard.”

Both bombed the ball back and forth at each other throughout, but Lutschaunig began to tire at the end of the first set after going through a 2 hour, 45 minute three-set first-round marathon 7-6 (7-5), 3-6, 6-3 victory over Unionville's John Wu, the No. 4 junior in the state.

“It was tough, and it was definitely starting a little bit behind the eight-ball,” Lutschaunig said. “But he was the better player on this day. Even if it was the first match of the day, I think he would have still gotten the better of me.”

Blasinsky's win started a sweep for the WPIAL in Class AAA as Mt. Lebanon junior Peter Hazlett in singles and the doubles teams of Fox Chapel's Sid Rajupet and Ben Short and Shady Side Academy's Alok Nimgaonkar and Chris Grubbs all reached the semifinals. It was the first time since 2010 all four Class AAA qualifiers pushed through to the semifinals.

In Class AA, the only District 7 state qualifier to win two matches and make it to the 9 a.m. Saturday Class AA semifinals was the Sewickley Academy doubles tandem of Will Kleeman and Colin Kaye.

The seniors rolled through two opponents to become just the sixth WPIAL Class AA doubles team to make it as far as the state semifinals. The Panthers clinched their spot in the matinee with a 6-4, 7-6 (7-5) victory over Diego Pinyo and Bryce Pinkerton of Brandywine Heights.

“There's just a lot more confidence,” Kleeman said. “I've been building confidence ever since I got here (two) years ago, and Colin really picked me up in the last match. Now we have to get ready for the final day. We only have two matches, so we have to be ready for it.”

Kaye and Kleeman will face District 2 champions Keller McGurrin and Peter Kazmierczak of Scranton Prep in the semifinals. If they are to become the first WPIAL team to qualify for the Class AA title match, they will have to clean up a bit of what they did in the latter portion of the quarterfinals.

Sewickley Academy appeared ready to close it up, 5-2, in the second set but allowed Brandywine Heights to rally for wins in four consecutive games to take a 6-5 lead. Kaye and Kleeman, though, fought through to win the 12th game then came back from down, 5-3, in the tie-breaker for four consecutive points to close it out.

“I think it was a combination of they began to play better, and we got a little lackadaisical,” Kaye said. “It just goes to show nothing is given to you.”

Mars' doubles team of Josh Raymundo and Aaron Gruber almost joined Kaye and Kleeman in the semifinals, which would have marked the first time two WPIAL teams made it into the semis in the same year. But after winning the first set, the Planets dropped a three-set 1-6, 7-5, 6-2 decision to Spencer Rhoads and Wes Davis of Lancaster Country Day and were eliminated.

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.