Shady Side Academy falls just short in PIAA tennis match
After cruising to a 6-0 first set win in the PIAA Class AAA doubles championships on May 25 at Hershey Racquet Club, it looked like Shady Side Academy's Alok Nimgaonkar and Chris Grubbs would end a five-year WPIAL drought and bring home the gold.
Their hopes were quickly dashed, however, as they fell to West Chester Rustin's John Lim and Derek Summers, 0-6, 6-2, 6-4.
Nimgaonkar and Grubbs jumped out to a 3-0 lead in the third set but couldn't close it out.
For awhile, it looked like it might be an all-WPIAL final as Fox Chapel's Ben Short and Sid Rajupet nearly knocked off Lim and Summers in the semifinals.
They lost in a three-set heartbreaker by scores of 6-4, 3-6, 7-6 (11-9).
Shady Side Academy coach Tom Mercer, despite the loss, was upbeat about the season.
“They made it to the finals,” he said. “As a team, we made it to the finals, so it was a very rewarding season. We nearly reached all of our goals but came up short. A lot of teams would love to have the season we had.
“The doubles match was frustrating, though. We started out playing very well. I think their guys were a little bit off of their game after that tense semifinal match but they rebounded nicely and we started making some errors.
“Give them credit, though. We have a strong nucleus coming back and we hope to be in the same position next year.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.