Share This Page

Derry debuts new tennis court

| Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Submitted
Ted Schmidbauer cuts the ribbon last week during the debut of Derry's new tennis court.

The debut of Derry's new tennis courts was a short one last week, as rain kept the team's match with Indiana from being finished.

The pre-match festivities did go on, however, including a ribbon-cutting ceremony by school board member Ted Schmidbauer and several of the Derry girls tennis players.

Board President David Krinock addressed the crowd and helped open the new tennis facility.

In the lineup for Derry that day were Jill Orazio, Hunter Hudson and Maria Palombo at singles and Natalie Sarnese/Emma Crocker and Abby Cox/Heather Ramsey in doubles.

The team returned to action later in the week at Mt. Pleasant for the annual Section 1-AA singles tournament.

Fourth-seeded Orazio won her opening-round match, 10-3, over Paige Hertzog from Mt. Pleasant, and then fell to Brentwood's Amanda Lynch, 11-9, in the quarterfinals.

“Jill really battled hard,” coach Tom Tatone said. “She was losing 5-2 and then the rain came through. All matches were halted for nearly two hours. When play resumed, Jill mounted a big comeback, getting behind by one game, 7-6.

“The final games were very competitive, but Jill could not quite pull out the match. She, too, really improved her singles game (that day).”

Hudson lost her opening-round match, 11-9, to Elizabeth Wohar from California.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.