Shady Side Academy tennis team undefeated as season enters second half
Shady Side Academy students participate in tennis fund raiser 'Swing For A Cure.' From left are Madison Mordoh, Emma Perelman and Amanda Murphy.
Photo by Jan Pakler | for The Herald
The Shady Side Academy tennis team is unbeaten with the season half over, and coach Tom Mercer is guardedly optimistic.
“It's great to be undefeated, and I thought that we would be good this year,” Mercer said. “My concern is that, aside from Fox Chapel, we really haven't played any of the big schools yet like North Allegheny, Mt. Lebanon and Peters Township.
“All three of those teams are very strong. I'm trying to schedule a match with a bigger school before the season ends. It would definitely help us before the playoffs.
“I believe that we'll definitely be in the mix for a championship, and we should go to states.”
The Indians had a strong nucleus of returning players, and the experience helped the team get off to a strong start.
“We didn't lose much to graduation, and all of the players came back a year better,” Mercer said. “We have good depth and experience up and down the lineup, and we're expecting a strong showing in the WPIAL and PIAA tournaments.”
The Indians are led by three sophomores at the three singles slots: Ananya Dua, Emma Perelman and Lindsey Miller.
Seniors Liza Plakseychuk and Amanda Murphy are playing No. 1 doubles, and senior Maddy Mordoh and freshman Devin Gramley play No. 2 doubles.
Junior Mara Barron and sophomore Maria Jovin bolster the Indians' depth.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.