Hampton girls tennis team has new goals
The last time the Hampton girls tennis team made it to the WPIAL quarterfinals, most of the girls on the current team were still in diapers — if they were even born.
The year was 1997. That was the last year the Talbots advanced past the first round, although they made it to the postseason last year, falling to Mt. Lebanon.
That early exit inspired this year's goal: make it to the quarterfinals. Last Thursday the Talbots accomplished that goal by defeating Section 1 champions Hempfield, 4-1. Their run came to an end Monday when the girls lost 5-0 to second-seeded Shady Side Academy.
Coach Grant McKinney gave a plethora of reasons for the team's success. He praised the leadership of his two captains, senior Katie Mueller and junior Rachael Harrison. Lucy Gloninger's strong performance at first singles was also an impetus for the team's triumphs. Gloninger had the most competitive match in the loss against Shady Side as she nearly took the second set before losing in a tiebreaker.
Another key to the Talbots' playoff run was the added depth provided by the second doubles team of freshman Maria Sadek and sophomore Celeste Lueers. Yet the team's most important assets may have been its camaraderie and ability to stay positive and have fun on the court. This enthusiasm and team spirit was important in making every match competitive.
“It was nice that the girls are driven to perform at a higher level,” McKinney said.
It is this desire for improvement, coupled with leadership, depth, and a stellar first singles stalwart, that make next year's goal attainable.
“We want to make it one step further to the semifinals and prove we're one of the top teams in Pittsburgh,” McKinney said.
S.R. Malone is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.