Share This Page

PIAA Class AA boys tennis team tournament preview: Valley vs. Fairview

| Monday, May 12, 2014, 12:18 a.m.
Erica Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Freeport's Kylee Shiring competes in the 400 meters on Thursday, May 8, 2014, during the WPIAL playoffs at Freeport.
Dan Speicher | For Valley News Dispatch
Valley's Cody Schrecongost plays against Chandra Muthia of Keystone Oaks in the WPIAL quarterfinals Monday, May 5, 2014, at Valley.

PIAA boys tennis team tournament

Class AA

First round

Valley (16-1) vs. Fairview (16-2)

1 p.m. Tuesday at Pennbriar Athletic Club, Erie

Winner plays: District 3 champion Wyomissing/District 4 runner-up Selinsgrove

Aces wild: Valley is in the PIAA team tournament for the first time in program history. The Vikings defeated Blackhawk, 5-0, in the WPIAL Class AA consolation match. Senior Cody Schrecongost, a standout in soccer and swimming, leads Valley as its No. 1 singles player. He won his third section singles title and teamed up with Josh Denham to earn his third doubles section championship. Denham and Adam Barone round out Valley's singles lineup. Adam Johnson and Andrew Macura comprised Valley's top doubles pair in the consolation match, and Ryan Moya and Nick Licata made up the No. 2 duo. ... Fairview swept Warren, 5-0, to win the District 10 championship. Sophomore Jon Oskin is the Tigers' No. 1 singles player. He is ranked No. 35 in the state in his class, according to Tennis Recruiting Network.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.