ShareThis Page

Freeport runner Reichenbaugh golden at PIAAs

Chris Harlan
| Saturday, May 27, 2017, 10:00 p.m.
Freeport's Robert Reichenbaugh wins the gold medal in the  Class AA 800 at the PIAA track and field championships Saturday, May 27, 2017, at Shippensburg.
Barry Reeger | For The Tribune-Review
Freeport's Robert Reichenbaugh wins the gold medal in the Class AA 800 at the PIAA track and field championships Saturday, May 27, 2017, at Shippensburg.

SHIPPENSBURG — Robert Reichenbaugh had a strategy for his 800-meter race Saturday and was determined to stick with it.

“I planned to follow the runner from Neumann-Goretti,” he said, “because I was trying to break the school record. I didn't care if I medaled, I was going for that time.”

Neumann-Goretti junior Kamil Jihad had run the fastest time in Friday's preliminaries, so Reichenbaugh shadowed him from the start Saturday. But ultimately, it was the Freeport senior who crossed the finish line first in 1 minute, 55.12 seconds to win gold at the PIAA track and field championships.

“I was waiting behind him for most of the race, just trying to stay with him,” Reichenbaugh said. “Once we got around the last corner, it's just whatever you have left. I guess I had a lot left.”

The WPIAL champion made his charge with about 120 meters left and passed Jihad and Milton Area junior Tyler Leeser in the final 50 meters. All three crossed the line within about a half-second span. Leeser was second at 1:55.44, and Jihad was third at 1:55.63.

“They were kicking ahead of me,” Reichenbaugh said, “but my sprint speed was just a little faster than theirs.”

The Freeport school record was about 1:55.8, Reichenbaugh said, so he earned that honor as well.

“(A plan) usually doesn't go that easily in track,” he said, “but today it worked out pretty well for me.”

Unexpected ending

For a few reasons, Jack Ryan wasn't supposed to be on the medal stand at the PIAA championships.

First, the Burrell senior tore an ACL last football season and underwent knee surgery in November. Second, his 100 time ranked just 18th in the state in Class AA.

Yet, on a knee that healed quickly, Ryan ran a personal best Saturday to place sixth, and he earned his unlikely spot on the medal stand at Seth Grove Stadium.

“I have to say I'm happy, for sure,” said Ryan, whose 11.11-second finish was one-hundredth faster than his previous best.

Ryan ran 11.46 in the WPIAL final and finished sixth, one spot short of qualifying for states. But he earned a trip to the PIAA meet after all when a runner ahead of him withdrew.

“I kind of hit a slump in the WPIALs,” Ryan said. “I didn't run nearly as well as I wanted. … There was more pressure in the WPIAL meet. Here, coming in as a real low seed, I said, ‘All right, I'm going to have some fun.' I just relaxed and ended up doing better than I thought.”

After his surgery, Ryan started light workouts in February but had ramped up his activity by April.

“We didn't push too hard, but as the season went along, he kept feeling healthier and healthier,” Burrell coach Steve White said. “Here we are today, him standing on the podium.”

Finishing fifth

Apollo-Ridge's Dillon Butz-Retzer placed fifth in the 100, earning the senior a Class AA medal. He finished in 22.88 seconds, better than the 22.94 he ran last week to place second in the WPIAL.

Butz-Retzer was the WPIAL's 400 champion but did not reach the state finals in that event.

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at charlan@tribweb.com or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.