ShareThis Page

Fox Chapel's Carnevale, Miller compete at PIAA meet

| Monday, June 5, 2017, 11:12 p.m.

The Fox Chapel track and field season recently concluded its season with Kate Carnevale and Caelan Miller running at the PIAA championships.

“Caelan ran the best race of her career,” FC coach Tom Moul said. “She finished 13th overall, just barely missing qualifying for finals. Kate made it to the semifinal round in the 200, so she can say she's one of the top 16 200-meter sprinters in the state. That's quite an accomplishment for a sophomore and first time track athlete.”

Carnevale broke school records in the 100 and 200. She and Miller were the team's co-MVPs.

“We also had Sarena Seeger and Annika Urban finish in the top eight at WPIALs so it was a very good season,” Moul said. “We'll miss our seniors. They provided much leadership and competitive spirit this season. It really was a pleasure coaching them for their high school track careers.”

Most of this year's performers will be back.

“We really did have a young team, especially on the girls side,” Moul said. “I'm looking forward to seeing what they can do next season, with another year of getting stronger and faster. We seem to have a core of very dedicated athletes who really want to improve and be major competitors in the WPIAL and, in some cases, the state.”

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.