ShareThis Page

Fox Chapel runner Seeger looks to improve on last year's performance

| Sunday, July 23, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
Junior Sarena Seeger is a returning runner for the Fox Chapel cross country team.
Submitted
Junior Sarena Seeger is a returning runner for the Fox Chapel cross country team.
Junior Sarena Seeger is a returning runner for the Fox Chapel cross country team.
Submitted
Junior Sarena Seeger is a returning runner for the Fox Chapel cross country team.

Sarena Seeger, a junior at Fox Chapel, finished 27th at the PIAA cross country championships as a freshman and improved to a 17th-place finish last year. In the WPIAL championships, she posted a 17th-place finish in her freshman year and followed that with a ninth-place finish this past fall. She's working this summer to continue that upward trend.

“We've been working out as a team, and I think we'll do very well this year,” she said. “We're looking real good, and we've got everybody back. We're hoping to go back to states.

“My individual goal is to improve my finish at WPIALs, qualify for states again and finish higher than I did last year. I've been running every other day, and I'll be ready to go when the season starts.”

She turned her focus to track and cross country in eighth grade.

“I had been involved in swimming, but I was beginning to not like it,” she said. “I decided to try out for track, and I'm glad I made the decision.”

Though a long way from making a college decision, Seeger knows she wants to major in business and possibly stay involved with track and cross country. “I have a lot of time to decide,” she said. “My focus now will be on helping the team have a successful season.”

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.