ShareThis Page

Steel Valley halts Thomas Jefferson's postseason bid

| Tuesday, May 8, 2012, 10:50 p.m.
SPORTS_SV_V_TJ VOLLYBALL2.jpg? (4 MB?)Thomas Jefferson's Adam Patrick spikes the ball past Steel Valley's Nate Labishak.Ron Vezzani  |  For The Daily News
SPORTS_SV_V_TJ VOLLYBALL2.jpg? (4 MB?)Thomas Jefferson's Adam Patrick spikes the ball past Steel Valley's Nate Labishak.Ron Vezzani | For The Daily News DN-SVTJVOLLEY2-050912

Steel Valley didn't need to beat Thomas Jefferson when the two teams squared off Tuesday for their regular-season finale.

Not only had the Ironmen already clinched the fourth and final WPIAL Class AA playoff spot out of Section 3, they were locked into that spot win or lose.

For the Jaguars, however, a victory meant everything. A win would move them into a tie with Steel Valley and extend their campaign with a slot in the postseason.

In the end, though, desperation wasn't enough, as Steel Valley (4-6) came from behind for a dramatic 3-2 (25-19, 23-25, 19-25, 25-15, 15-13) win that eliminated the Jaguars from postseason contention.

“We're a young team and we're making simple mistakes,” Thomas Jefferson coach Frank Staffen said. “They're basically all first-year players and it's just a matter of concentration. Volleyball is a game of momentum and we just lost the momentum.”

In the deciding fifth game, senior outside hitters Nate Labishak and Zack Graham each had three kills to help propel the Ironmen attack. Labishak was also pivotal to the team's comeback from an early deficit in the fourth game.

“I decided in that fourth game that I was going to move Zack to a middle position and keep Nate at the middle as well,” Steel Valley coach JaQuan McNeil said. “With those two both hitting middles, it works well.”

Neither team truly dominated the other as both attacks were replete with service errors, unforced errors, plays into the net and general miscues that kept the match close. Steel Valley was initially able to limit its mistakes as the first game wore on, but after the Jaguars rallied to take a 2-1 lead, the Ironmen were able to come back and win their second five-set meeting between the two schools.

Graham was instrumental in the team taking control in the early part of the match as he had five of the Ironmen's seven kills in their Game 1 win. But junior middle hitter Adam Miller and sophomore middle hitter Ben Miscavage and the team's lone senior, outside hitter Connor Kooyer, were able to turn the tide at the net with several critical kills to help Thomas Jefferson reload and take the lead after the third game.

“It seems like this season we've been a comeback team for most of the year,” McNeil said. “We win games and I'm okay with that.”

Now, Steel Valley will have to build off this match and get ready for the WPIAL Class AA playoffs, which are slated to open May 15. Because they finished in fourth place and won't play a team from their own section, they will likely have a tough postseason opener against one of the top seeds in the tournament, which would mean either Ambridge, ranked No. 3 in the state by the Pennsylvania Volleyball Coaches' Association, or No. 9 Deer Lakes.

“Teams like that, you have to make sure your middle hitters hit and you have someone outside blocking,” McNeil said. “They come with so many combinations that we have to work on every aspect of the game of volleyball.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1977.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.