ShareThis Page

Weaknesses show in West Shamokin loss

| Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2012, 10:50 p.m.
West Shamokin's Alecia Calhoun blocks a ball hit by Greensburg Central Catholic's Emma Dickson (11) during a match on Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2012. (Kim Stepinsky | For The Leader Times)
West Shamokin's Alecia Calhoun (right) pushes the ball through a block attempt by Greensburg Central Catholic's Angela Komoroski (15) and Emma Dickson (11) during a match held at Greensburg Central Catholic High School on Tuesday evening, September 18, 2012. Kim Stepinsky | For The Leader Times

At least now West Shamokin's girls volleyball team knows where it stands in Section 1-A.

In a departure from the norm, the Lady Wolves (3-2, 3-2) are looking up at two teams in the section standings as they approach the halfway point of the season. Their 3-0 loss Tuesday night to section favorite and host Greensburg Central Catholic (5-0, 5-0), the No. 2 Class A team in the state, according to the Pennsylvania Volleyball Coaches Association, left no doubt that they must improve considerably to fulfill their preseason plan of vying for a section title.

“We need to work on intensity,” said West Shamokin coach Justin Nolder, whose team also lost to Riverview. “Just getting excited about the small things and ecstatic about the big things.”

West Shamokin went through spurts of strong play during the loss at Greensburg Central Catholic. In the first game, a 25-19 loss, the Lady Wolves trailed 15-14 but then allowed a four-point run. West Shamokin rallied late in Game 2, a 25-17 loss, by winning six of the final seven points.

And in the third game, it actually led, 23-20, but gave up a five-point run to end the match.

A whopping 46 unforced errors, including 17 bad serves, stifled West Shamokin's ability to sustain momentum. High points such as back-to-back aces by both senior Jill Glover and junior Amanda Wensel or key blocks by junior Alecia Calhoun moved to the back of the Lady Wolves' minds when the breakdowns occurred.

“We get down on ourselves,” said Glover, who finished with 12 kills, three aces and a block. “We need to pick each other up and lean on each other.”

Nolder approved of the way his team blocked. But he wanted more confidence from his players when the time came to fire away.

“We didn't give them enough offense, and I guess that's what the whole match boiled down to,” Nolder said.

GCC also had its share of lapses, including 26 unforced errors.

“I didn't feel they played up to their abilities,” coach Heather Meyer said. “If they want to get where they want to get, they've got to do a lot better.

Senior Shannon Hurley led the Lady Centurions with seven kills, and Emma Dickson followed with six kills and three aces. Meyer said Greensburg Central Catholic missed opportunities to accumulate even more kills. So did Nolder.

“I expected them to bring it at us,” Nolder said. “I was disappointed that we didn't bring more at them, considering what we actually saw from them.”

West Shamokin shared section titles in 2008 and 2009, the last two times it competed in Class A. The Lady Wolves aren't ready to see the streak fall in their return to the lowest classification.

“The slant we're going to use going forward is we're learning from our mistakes, from our losses,” Nolder said. “We're going to use those lessons in the second half of the season.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-543-1303 ext. 1321.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.