Area girls volleyball teams focus on playoffs
TribLIVE Sports Videos
West Shamokin girls volleyball coach Justin Nolder admits there's disappointment that no section title banner for the this season will hang on the wall in West Shamokin's gym.
But he wants his Wolves to realize they're still capable of claiming greater honors.
Back in Class A after two years of modest success in Class AA, West Shamokin (9-3, 9-3) came up short in its effort to share the Section 1 title, as it did in 2008 and '09.
The Wolves tied Riverview for second place and finished behind Greensburg Central Catholic, the Pennsylvania Volleyball Coaches Association's No. 2 Class A team. Nolder has urged the girls to strive for a potential third meeting with the Centurions, who are likely to receive the WPIAL's top seed when the pairings are announced Monday.
“I told the girls after (the second loss to Greensburg Central Catholic), it is what it is,” Nolder said. “We still have an opportunity to do something very special. It is very possible that we (West Shamokin and Greensburg Central Catholic) could end up being the last two teams left in Class A.”
West Shamokin's morale approached an apex last weekend, when the Wolves hosted an 11-team tournament that included numerous playoff-bound Class AA and A teams.
“I think we're playing our best ball right now, which is critical,” Nolder said. “There were teams that could really put the ball away on us (at the tournament), and we defended them well.”
West Shamokin's second-place split with Riverview might leave the Wolves with a tumultuous path in the playoffs.
Nolder hopes the fact that West Shamokin won the second meeting with Riverview might tilt seeding in favor of his team.
Freeport coach Tom Phillips also wants WPIAL officials follow that logic when they seed the Class AA field. Phillips' Yellowjackets (14-1, 11-1) and Mars shared the Section 4-AA title, but Freeport won the latter meeting.
Recent playoff history should help Freeport's case for a high seed. The Yellowjackets reached the finals each of the last three seasons and took home the title in 2010.
Phillips has insisted throughout the fall that this Freeport team is as talented as any he's coached. But the Yellowjackets needed time to determine which of their talents to emphasize.
“One thing we found out this year is that we're not a conventional team,” Phillips said. “We don't have two outside hitters, two middles. Almost every one of our girls can play a lot of different positions. … I saw early on this year that we could move people around and look for some matchup problems.”
Kittanning coach Kara Grafton's wish for her Wildcats (11-3, 8-2), who placed second behind Indiana in Section 3-AA, is to avoid a powerhouse. That way, the team might advance to the quarterfinals for the first time.
Each of the past three years, Kittanning placed second in its section. And each year, it received a preliminary-round game, which it won. Then came a matchup against a top-four seed.
A season ago, the Wildcats ran into top-seeded Hopewell, which won handily on its way to a WPIAL title.
Kittanning's entire starting lineup from last season returned, so there's no shortage of playoff experience.
“I can definitely see the potential to take another step for the program, especially with this core group of girls,” Grafton said. “They understand that they can play with these bigger teams, even if they're outsized.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.