Mt. Lebanon claims 6th WPIAL volleyball championship
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Mt. Lebanon ensured that not all of the WPIAL girls volleyball championships went to teams that previously lacked titles Saturday at Chartiers Valley High School.
The No. 4 seed Blue Devils edged Class AAA finals newcomer Fox Chapel, 3-1, to claim a sixth WPIAL crown. After losing the first game, 25-21, they took three in a row, 25-13, 25-22 and 25-20.
“Our kids, they don't get real caught up in the big momentum swings that a big kill or run can have,” Mt. Lebanon coach Jeff Schilling said. “Our kids just stay the course. They know they have more games to go, and they're not under the gun. When you can find that relaxed level, it really helps you out.”
No. 3 Fox Chapel (17-3) seemed to peak at the end of Game 1, as the Foxes won the final five points. But Mt. Lebanon immediately shifted the momentum with an 8-2 run to open Game 2.
Neither team thrived for a long stretch in Game 3, which included 17 tie scores. Caroline Grattan scored three of the Blue Devils' final four points to help pull out the win.
Mt. Lebanon charged out to a 5-1 lead in the last game, but Fox Chapel found a way to rally and hang close. The Foxes never tied the score, however, and Alexa Pavlick's two kills clinched the match for the Blue Devils.
Grattan finished with 21 kills. Pavlick added eight, four of which came in Game 4.
Sarah Bradley hit a team-high 12 kills for Fox Chapel. Megan Hollingsworth and Riley Herrmann each had 10 kills.
“We knew coming in this would be our toughest match of the year because they're a lot like us,” Fox Chapel coach Sara D'Angelo said. “They're scrappy, they're defensive. I don't think we were prepared for the back and forth. We like to keep the momentum and go on runs.”
Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.