Deer Lakes volleyball falls in quarterfinals
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Execution, or lack thereof, can make all the difference in the WPIAL boys volleyball playoffs.
No. 5 seed Deer Lakes failed to take advantage of a lead, dropping its Class AA quarterfinal match to No. 4 Beaver County Christian, 3-2, Thursday night at North Allegheny.
“(BCC) just hit smarter,” coach Rick Tatrn said. “When you don't hit smart, you get in trouble.”
Deer Lakes (11-3) went back and forth before winning Game 1 and rallied late to take Game 2 before dropping the final three games.
“We had Kody (Buttyan) do a lot tonight,” Tatrn said. “We played him all the way around. I wanted to rest him in the second half of game three. Now, I'm sorry I didn't. I think he ran out of gas.”
Buttyan, a 6-foot-5 middle hitter, had 22 kills, as did Donny Szoszorek. Zach Guiciardi had 45 assists.
The Lancers started strong, only trailing in the early stages in Game 1. A late rally by BCC was squashed, leading to a 25-23 victory.
Deer Lakes was able to erase a late deficit for a 25-22 win in Game 2.
“I think we played well for the first two games,” Tatrn said. “When you're up 2-0 and in command, you have to find a way to finish.”
Deer Lakes' height advantage was evident in the first two games as the Lancers were able to control play at the net. The final three games were a different story.
“(Beaver County Christian) kept their back row off-balance,” Tatrn said. “They tipped the ball a lot, they rolled the ball a lot. They didn't try to beat our blocks. They hit smart. They played smart.”
BCC matched Deer Lakes' powerful play at the net but managed to work the ball away from players like Buttyan, 6-6 Szoszorek and 6-4 outside hitter Nick Roberts on the opposite side.
Deer Lakes never held a lead in the third, and fourth games, falling 25-20 and 25-22, and then dropped a 15-12 decision in the fifth.
Dave Yohe is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.