Norwin volleyball team's season ends in PIAA playoffs
TribLIVE Sports Videos
After a third-place finish in the PIAA Class AAA tournament a season ago, the Norwin boys volleyball team hoped to make another run to Penn State this season.
While the Knights advanced to the state playoffs via a third-place finish in the WPIAL tournament, a return visit to State College wasn't in the cards.
Norwin (14-4) lost, 3-0, to North Allegheny in the first round of the PIAA playoffs last week at North Hills. North Allegheny swept the games by scores of 25-12, 25-12 and 25-11.
North Allegheny, which won its seventh straight WPIAL championship last month, advanced to the PIAA semifinals with a 3-0 victory over Bethel Park over the weekend.
“It was very disappointing,” Norwin coach Al Warden said. “I would have expected us to have a little bit better showing. It was a tough way to end the season.”
The Knights fell behind early as North Allegheny scored the first seven points of the first game. The Tigers led by as many as 17 points in the first game before a late Norwin run.
“I think they got shell-shocked early on in that first game,” Warden said. “Even when we made a good serve or they shanked the ball, they bettered the ball. It kind of just steamrolled, and we could never gain any momentum from there on in.”
The second and third games looked mostly the same as North Allegheny controlled play for the large portion of both games.
Warden went to a different lineup in the third game, sitting out a few of his usual starters. The move didn't work, and North Allegheny rolled to the sweep.
“My rationale for (the move) was that these guys aren't talking or anything, so let's go with a lineup we've never practiced, which is going to require them to talk to each other before, during and after every single ball in the hopes that it would make them work as one,” Warden said.
“It failed miserably, so that was my fault, but I just thought if I don't do something, we're going to get the same result. Unfortunately, we still did get the same result.”
Despite the disappointing finish, Warden said the Knights had plenty of successes this season.
Norwin won its third straight section championship, losing just one section match in the process. The Knights also advanced to the state tournament for the third season in a row.
“I don't know if we were necessarily picked to win the section again, but we fought, came out on top and took the section by ourselves,” Warden said. “Top three in the WPIAL, state playoffs — (the loss to North Allegheny) hurt that night, but I think after it's said and done those guys are going to be proud of what they accomplished.”
Norwin will need to replace six seniors from this season's team: Mitch Farabaugh, Phil Hartley, Dane Hilko, Nick Idele, Matt Kelly and Josh Vasko. Farabaugh, Hilko and Idele were all-WPIAL selections, with Hilko earning third-team honors, Farabaugh making the second team and Idele getting named to the first team.
Warden, however, has replaced all-WPIAL players before. All-WPIAL players Chad Brough and Nate Derry were among five seniors who graduated after last season.
The coach said he would look to Nick Nguyen, Aaron Shaffer and Kevin Zabelski to take on larger roles next season after all three contributed to the team's success as juniors.
Nguyen split time with Farabaugh as the Knights' setter this season. Shaffer played all over the court in just his second season playing volleyball, and Zabelski contributed to Norwin's offensive success as an opposite-side hitter.
“I'm losing a guy who kind of set the table by passing the ball (Hilko), I'm losing a big gun in the middle (Idele) and just some senior leadership (Farabaugh) — Mitch just played so hard and so well,” Warden said. “I'm losing a little bit of everything that you need to be successful. But we've got some pieces coming back. We'll see what happens.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.