ShareThis Page

Plum girls volleyball team earns fifth at Butler Tournament

Michael Love
| Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Plum varsity girls volleyball team's journey in Section 4-AAA has begun, but before the Mustangs were able to focus on section foes such as McKeesport and Shaler this week, they jumped into the mix at the Butler Tournament on Saturday at Butler High School.

It was the first of four tournaments Plum will play this season in addition to its conference schedule and nonconference matches.

The Mustangs placed fifth out of eight teams at Butler, and first-year head coach Mike Larko Jr. said the field of squads helped his rotation of starters and subs get a feel for the young season.

“It was a very strong tournament from top to bottom, and we wanted to have that,” Larko said.

“The girls like competition. It really let us see what we still need to work on.”

Larko said he didn't know a whole lot about each of the tournament teams before Saturday's event.

“But we knew they've been good for several years in their sections and qualifying for WPIALs,” Larko said.

Plum found itself in a four-team pool with Avonworth, Indiana and West Allegheny.

The Mustangs split with Avonworth and Indiana and lost a pair of games to West Allegheny to finish pool play 2-4.

The two games against West Allegheny were close, as the Indians won, 25-21 and 26-24.

“The two matches with West Allegheny were close and competitive, but we just weren't able to make enough plays,” Larko said.

“A point here and there was the difference in both games.”

Plum advanced to the playoffs and fell to host Butler in one game to 25 in the quarterfinals.

“We looked pretty good at times — we passed well, set well, hit well, served well and played good defense — and other times, we didn't play well,” Larko said.

“You will have that with early-season matches. We knew we would be competitive and have a chance to do well based on our strengths and our talent. We just have to eliminate large swings of momentum.

“The girls were frustrated with games they didn't play well in and were encouraged with games where they played the way they are capable of playing. We have to keep working hard to be more consistent. We have a lot to work on still.”

Plum was scheduled to open section play Tuesday at home against McKeesport. The match was to be played past the deadline for this week's edition.

The Mustangs pay a visit to section foe and 2012 WPIAL playoff qualifier Shaler on Thursday at 7:30 p.m.

Plum then returns to Shaler High School on Saturday for the Shaler Tournament. Action is scheduled to begin at 8 a.m.

Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825 or at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.