Hampton girls volleyball improving
TribLIVE Sports Videos
At Hampton, girls volleyball coach Brian Tevis is focused on building a contender year-in and year-out. So when the coach is looking at the big picture where this program can go, he breaks it down to the smallest details in order to allow the little things lead to bigger successes.
Tevis has a handful of returning players who will serve as the foundation for the team, but when it comes to wins and losses, the wins can come in more ways than a better score at the end of a set.
“Obviously you go into the season to try to make the playoffs,” Tevis said. “I want the kids to progress each day. Before you compete with the tough teams, the Pine-Richlands, NAs and Seneca Valleys, you have to compete against yourselves and define success by a little each day.”
To help get this team where it wants to go, Tevis will rely on the skills of seniors LeAnne Disco and Anne Cully, who have started for him the past three seasons.
Also playing significant roles will be setter Amanda Hedges and outside hitter Paige Whistler.
“We have a good nucleus and some youth (including three sophomores who) will see significant playing time,” Tevis said. “I look forward to their growth and potential.”
Tevis said playing as a team will lead to his squad being able to compete with the tougher teams in the section, and with the seniors having the experience against tough competition, there will be no quit in this team.
“I am impressed with how the older players have taken the younger players under their wing,” he said. “This is a close team, and how they help each other is what impresses me.”
Tevis will define the success of the team by how it improves each day — as individuals as well as a team.
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.