Baldwin girls volleyball team finishes regular season with a bang
They did, indeed, save their best performance for last.
The Baldwin girls' varsity volleyball team knocked off previously undefeated Bethel Park, 3-1, last week in its final section match of the 2013 season.
It was senior recognition night for the Lady Highlanders, and what better way for Lindsey Kozel, Katie Lachut, Tori Johnston and Rachel Baldinger to end their high school careers at Baldwin than to upset the reigning Section 5-AAA champions at home.
Baldwin stunned Bethel Park by scores of 25-20, 25-19, 13-25 and 25-19.
The Lady Highlanders staged a furious rally in the fourth game.
Behind the outstanding serving of Sarah Walsh, a junior libero, and Maddi Sgattoni, a freshman setter/right-side hitter, Baldwin rallied from a huge deficit to win by six points against the visiting Black Hawk girls.
Sgattoni also sparked the Lady Highlanders from behind in the second game of the match.
Kozel, Lachut, Johnston and Baldinger, all defensive specialists, were joined in Baldwin's starting lineup by Sgattoni; juniors Tori Dedig, at middle hitter; Tori Sgattoni, a right-side/middle hitter; and Walsh; and sophomores Mallory O'Brien, at setter; Mac Voelker, an outside hitter; and Jamie Schleicher, at middle hitter.
Johnston and Welsh served as team captains this season.
Key reserves for Baldwin in the regular-season finale included sophomore setter Emma Dongilli, sophomore right-side hitter Kadin Hinish, and freshman outside hitter Sydney Yanchik.
Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-388-5820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.