The Fox Chapel volleyball team concluded its season with a 3-0 win over Upper St. Clair last week.
It was the final match for four FC seniors — Hannah Zonker, Megan Holingsworth, Michaela Patsko and Betsy Slagle.
Holingsworth, Patsko and Slagle were team captains and four-year letterwinners. Zonker was a two-year letterwinner.
The Foxes finished 7-10 overall and 4-8 in the section.
“We have a very challenging section with some of the best teams in the western side of the state,” Fox Chapel coach Sara Kirsch said. “After our WPIAL runner-up performance last year, we knew this would be a rebuilding year, and it was. Some of our younger players stepped into important roles on the team.”
The coach said Ana Spangenberg, a sophomore setter, was one such player.
Spangenberg was the teams leader in kills and assists in many games.
“Kayla Slovenec, another sophomore, also took on a setting role for the team,” Kirsch said.
Leah Eckman, a junior, and Murphy Patterson, a sophomore, stepped into middle-hitter spots.
“Katie Costanza was a defensive specialist and another sophomore playing an important role,” Kirsch said.
“Often during the season, we had four sophomores on the court at any given time.”
The season, said Kirsch, provided the younger players a lot of experience and sense for the level of play expected to compete in the section.
“We're looking forward to next season,” Kirsch said.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.