ShareThis Page

Freeport volleyball advances with win over Quaker Valley

| Thursday, Oct. 24, 2013, 11:39 p.m.
Erica Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Freeport's Alexis Schrecengost (23) blocks a shot by Quaker Valley's Ashlee Bacvinskas during their WPIAL Class AA playoff match Thursday, Oct. 24, 2013, at Freeport High School.
Steven Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Freeport's Zoe Pawlak (24) and Jessica Kelley (2) block a shot by Quaker Valley's Kathryn Wroblewski during their WPIAL Class AA playoff match on Thursday, October 24, 2013, at Freeport High School.

Freeport's big hitters have the Yellowjackets moving to the quarterfinals.

Alexis Schrecengost and Zoe Pawlak both had nine kills to send No. 2 Freeport to a win over No. 15 Quaker Valley, 3-0, in the first round of the WPIAL Class AA girls volleyball playoffs Thursday at Freeport.

Jessica Kelley added seven kills and five blocks for Freeport (15-1), which advances to face No. 7 Central Valley on Tuesday at a site and time to be determined. The Yellowjackets won by set scores of 25-18, 25-11, 25-17.

Alyssa Bartling had eight kills to lead Quaker Valley (11-5), which was coming off a five-set preliminary round win over Derry two days ago.

Though the Yellowjackets boasted a clear size advantage at the net, the Quakers managed to hang in the match by prolonging points with good defense and back row play.

“They played very good defense tonight, and we knew they would do that coming in,” Freeport coach Tom Phillips said. “I think we were pretty aggressive tonight, too, but they brought that good defense. We did well because it's playoff time, and anything can happen.”

Quaker Valley's defense kept the match close in the opening set, and the visiting team stayed within two all the way to 16-14. As Freeport began to pull away, QV coach Mike Vavrek took advantage of his timeouts and made some late substitutions to disrupt the flow of Freeport's servers.

“Whatever I could do to slow the game up, I did. I wanted to give our girls their best opportunity to win,” Vavrek said. “(Freeport) is a very good team, and I thought we did a great job competing with them. We definitely lack the weapons they have, but I'm proud of my girls for not giving up.”

Freeport's serving began to take its toll in the second game, as Grace Ward strung together seven straight service points, including an ace, to put the Yellojackets ahead, 8-2. Emily Toy had a pair of aces of her own while serving up seven points for Freeport, which began to find more holes in the defense.

“The first game, we were playing well, but so were they,” Phillips said. “I think in the second game we changed things up a bit, and we did some things to take advantage of our matchups. Winning the second game the way we did was big for us.”

The Quakers still battled in the third set and took a 7-4 lead on a pair of kills and an ace from Jade Kost, who finished with six kills. Freeport answered by looking to the middle, where Kelley recorded three of her kills to put her team back in front for good.

“I'm happy with our performance tonight. It was good, sound Freeport volleyball,” Phillips said. “We like the challenge we got, and Quaker Valley came in to compete with us. We just had to exploit our matchups where we could be strong swinging from the outside.”

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.