ShareThis Page

Knoch, Freeport to settle volleyball series

| Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2013, 11:09 p.m.
Steven Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Freeport's Zoe Pawlak (center) and Jessica Kelley block a shot by Quaker Valley's Kathryn Wroblewski during the volleyball game at Freeport High School on Thursday, October 24, 2013.

Through social media and other means, Knoch's girls volleyball players kept track of Freeport's WPIAL Class AA quarterfinal-round match against Central Valley at Fox Chapel High School as they waited for their own quarterfinal against Thomas Jefferson to start Tuesday night at Chartiers Valley.

Freeport's match began at 6 p.m., while Knoch's was scheduled to commence at 7:30 p.m., so the Knights figured they had time to learn if they'd meet their Section 4 rival in the semifinals.

“They were kind of listening, and they heard Freeport dropped the first game, so they weren't sure who'd won” before warm-ups started, Knoch coach Diane Geist said. “But we figured Freeport would probably win.”

Knoch figured correctly, as the No. 2 seed Yellowjackets (16-1) defeated Central Valley, 3-1. And the No.6 Knights (16-2), careful to not look past their own quarterfinal opponent, topped No. 3 Thomas Jefferson, 3-1.

Now comes the much-anticipated third encounter between the section co-champs. Freeport and Knoch, which won the more recent of their two regular-season matches, will clash in the semifinals at 6 p.m. Thursday at North Hills.

The Yellowjackets are in the semifinals for the fourth time in five years.

“It's great for people to have high expectations for you and think you can go far,” sophomore outside/middle hitter Zoe Pawlak said of Freeport's annual title aspirations. “We try to take that and use it as confidence.”

The Knights are semifinalists for the first time since 2003, when they ultimately reached the WPIAL finals.

“We started playing together in seventh grade, this group of seniors, and we knew our senior season would be our year,” Knoch senior middle hitter Mary Zellhart said. “We've wanted to make this happen so bad, and all of our desire and passion is pouring out on the court now.”

Regardless of Thursday's outcome, both teams advance to the PIAA tournament. The winner will meet either No. 1 Indiana or No. 4 Hopewell at 4:15 p.m. Saturday in the championship match.

Freeport beat Knoch, 3-0, when the teams met Sept. 10. In the rematch on Oct. 3, the Knights prevailed, 3-2, with wins in Game 1 (25-21), Game 4 (26-24) and Game 5 (15-12). The Yellowjackets, who squandered match point in Game 4, claimed Games 2 and 3, 27-25 and 25-20.

“I think (the second time), the girls were pumped up and wanted it more,” Geist said of her players. “We'd seen them play and knew what they were going to do, so we adjusted for that. And it was still a really difficult game, even knowing what they were going to do to us.”

Rarely were the two teams tested in matches during the weeks since that rematch. Tuesday served as an effective tune-up for Thursday, though, as both teams encountered challenging opposition.

Freeport needed to rally after losing its first game against Central Valley, 25-12.

“I think my setters were a little tentative and were afraid of the big block out there, our coverage wasn't there, and it wasn't really one of our stellar performances,” Freeport coach Tom Phillips. “As the night went on, we got better.”

The Knights needed to calm their nerves after a 25-18 loss to Thomas Jefferson in Game 3.

“We did get a little out of sorts (in Game 3),” Zellhart said. “We got in one rotation we just couldn't get out of. Our coach said we just thought too much. We just needed to play the game and play with confidence.”

Anything less than another nail-biter would surprise both sides of this Butler County clash.

“It'll definitely be a tough game,” Geist said, “because we beat them the last time, so they're going to be out for us.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.