Hampton wrestlers to be led by Shulman
The Hampton wrestling team lately has established itself as a team nobody wants to face and this season should be no different. Coach Joe Bursick returns a handful of his best grapplers from a season ago as well as some rising talent that will help the team compete again this season.
The team begins with Noah Shulman, a 270-pounder who reported a little lighter than expected.
“Noah is a talented and hard-working (guy),” Bursick said. “He has high expectations, so not making a trip to Hershey would be a disappointment.”
Jake Hart (195) also is back, and is looking to finish atop the PIAA bracket after taking second in the state last season.
“He has put in a lot of time during the offseason,” Bursick said.
Another wrestler with high expectations is senior Kevin Synan. Synan, a 145-pounder, was one match away from states as a junior, and Bursick said he is hopeful this will be his year.
A couple of other wrestlers Bursick listed among his big guns are Colin Sisord, who will wrestle between 160 and 170, and Chris Olfzewski at 138.
According to Bursick, Zach Kosak is a sleeper for the state tournament, and he and Jimmy Davis are part of a loaded roster.
“We stress the team concept during the season,” Bursick said. “The playoffs it is different.
“We are entering the season coming off a great offseason, and the guys have a good attitude.”
The Talbots will get a great test Saturday to start the season: Shaler, Fox Chapel and Seneca Valley, among many others, will square off in a tournament at Hampton that runs from 8:30 a.m. through 5 p.m.
“We have a good core of guys, and this may be the most talented team I have coached,” Bursick said. “But we have got to produce ... We won't win based off of what we think.”
Jerry Clark is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.