Greensburg Salem wrestling to celebrate program's 700th win
By Paul Schofield
Published: Monday, Dec. 17, 2012, 10:40 p.m.
Greensburg Salem has a storied football program with 674 victories, ranking third in the WPIAL behind New Castle and Jeannette.
The wrestling program, which began in 1936, achieved the 700-win milestone with three victories at the North Hills Duals on Saturday.
The Greensburg Salem School District will honor the achievement Wednesday when the Golden Lions host Indiana. The ceremony is at 6:45 p.m., followed by the match. School officials urge all past wrestlers to attend.
“It's neat that we have two highly recognized programs at the state,” said Greensburg Salem wrestling coach Randy Parsley, who was a wrestler for the school's 400th win, assistant coach for No. 500 and head coach for the 600th and 700th victories. “This program has a lot of stability. You don't have to worry about who is the coach.”
Past coaches, PIAA and WPIAL champions and former wrestlers will be attending, including three-time NCAA champions Greg Jones (West Virginia) and Brian Kapusta (North Dakota State) and Hall of Fame coach Rob Waller.
Others expected to attend are PIAA champions Phil Detore (1965), Mickey Kenney (1970), Ken Parsley (1978), Donnie Jones (2003, 2004) and Jeff Kapusta (1992).
Jeff Kapusta, Kenny Trumbetta and the late Sam Kucenic were two-time All-Americans, and Vertus Jones, who will be unable to attend, was a state champion and a three-time All-American at West Virginia.
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.