Share This Page

Mustangs top Fox Chapel, 37-21

| Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2012, 8:56 p.m.

After a 43-16 loss to Hampton in its Section 3-AAA opener on Dec. 12, the Plum varsity wrestling team hoped to bounce back against section foe Fox Chapel last week.

In front of their home fans at Plum High School, the Mustangs were able to do just that.

Plum won nine of the 13 contested bouts, including five straight from 126 to 152, in a 37-21 victory.

Junior Mike Walkup made his season debut after missing the Eastern Area tournament and the Hampton match.

He got into the win column with a pinfall victory in 3:00 at 132.

Freshman Tommy Zummo earned a 10-7 decision victory at 126, and Walkup's and Zummo's wins started the five-bout streak.

After Walkup's triumph, junior Eric Green got into the act with 13-4 major decision at 138.

Senior Anthony Zummo won 4-2 at 145, while sophomore Zach Martin did the same with a 10-3 victory at 152.

Junior Andy McRandal, who started the season strong at the Eastern Area tournament, continued his winning ways against Fox Chapel, as he won by decision, 3-2, at 170.

Sophomore Nate Turchick had no problems at 182, as he pinned his opponent in only 37 seconds.

Senior Jake DiGuilio also recorded a quick pin, defeating Fox Chapel's Adam Novacic in 1:10 at 220.

Freshman Tony DiNinno, like some of the other first-year varsity performers, continued to gain experience.

It was a positive experience for him against Fox Chapel, as he scored a 9-3 win in his bout at 106.

Plum wrestlers hope to ride the momentum from the victory into the Steve DeAugustino Memorial Tournament, set for Friday and Saturday at West Mifflin High School.

Thirty teams are in the field and wrestling starts Friday at 10:45 a.m.

Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825 or at mlove@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.