ShareThis Page

West Shamokin's Glover grapples with heftier foes

| Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013, 11:56 p.m.
West Shamokin's Brenden Glover and Kittanning's Jacob Robb (top) are tied up in a stalemate during the 170-pound match at Kittanning High School on Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013.
Louis B. Ruediger | Leader times
Louis B. Ruediger
West Shamokin's Brenden Glover and Kittanning's Jacob Robb (top) are tied up in a stalemate during the 170-pound match at Kittanning High School on Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013. Louis B. Ruediger | Leader times

As West Shamokin sophomore Brenden Glover approached the scorer's table Wednesday night during a wrestling match at Kittanning, he looked to see who the Wildcats chose to send out as his opponent for the 160-pound bout.

No one emerged for Kittanning, which was certain to win the match because of West Shamokin's six forfeits.

Glover rolled his eyes and waited at the table for the official to declare “no match” at 160 and move on to 170. Then, he checked in again.

A take-on-all-comers mentality is one Glover, a 160-pounder, must embrace as he prepares to go deeper in the individual postseason after reaching the WPIAL tournament as a 152-pound freshman. His practice partners can push him only so far. And if West Shamokin's opponent lacks an opponent in his weight class, Glover is not interested in stepping on the mat simply to have his hand raised for a forfeit victory.

Glover lost, 6-0, to his Kittanning foe, Jacob Robb, on Wednesday. But he viewed himself as better off afterward.

“It'd be nice to get a win, but getting experience is something that I really need,” said Glover, who has a 12-5 record with wins against opponents from the 182-, 170- and 160-pound weight classes. “I want to get as many matches as I can.”

He started the season as a 170-pounder and won his first six bouts — five of them by pinfall. Valley's Dylan Clark ended the streak with a 9-4 decision Dec. 12, and Burrell's Nicholas Pattock handed Glover another loss (7-5).

In between those two Section 3-AA setbacks, Glover competed at the Redbank Valley holiday tournament, where he placed fourth in the 12-man 160-pound bracket.

Last weekend, Glover won the 160-pound weight class in Indiana's Harry “Bo” Wood tournament, a pool-format individual competition.

Of his 12 wins this season, eight are pins. Glover, who stands a couple inches over 6 feet, tries to overpower opponents when possible. But with so many of his foes weighing more and possessing more strength, the sophomore has relied on his limber, lanky frame and wits.

“I think I'm pretty good at scrambling, and a lot of my teammates tell me that I'm really gumby, and any position really doesn't hurt me that much,” Glover said.

Coach Matt Reefer hopes Glover will diversify his offensive go-to options; the half-nelson is Glover's old reliable. Brawny opponents help break Glover of his predictable habits.

“It's only going to make him better,” Reefer said. “He hasn't wrestled long enough to have the mat time that everybody else has, so we have to get it anywhere we can during the season.”

Glover got into wrestling after he watched his older brother, Tucker, who started the sport in seventh grade. In elementary school, Glover played basketball. He had the height but not the heart for the game. Wrestling, on the other hand, put enough control in the hands of individuals, an aspect Glover appreciated.

These days, his opponents' weight is not as predictable as he would prefer. But Glover goes through the mismatches with an eye toward the postseason, when the lineup juggling of dual meets will no longer be an issue.

“I think it really helps because I'm wrestling all the bigger guys,” Glover said. “Wrestling at 160, it seems a lot easier to move them around. They're not as strong and not as big. … Right now, I'm not frustrated at all.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.