Strong start for BVA wrestlers in WCCA
Belle Vernon's Brendan Hasson (top) takes down Yough's Dante Botti in their 120-pound bout during the quarterfinal round of the Westmoreland County Coaches Association Tournament at Franklin Regional in Murrysville on January 11, 2013. Hasson won by fall at 57 seconds.
Photo by Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Belle Vernon Area coach Jack Jolley hopes he is as happy on the bus ride home today from the Westmoreland County Coaches Association Tournament as he was Friday night.
Jolly saw six of his 13 BVA wrestlers advance to the semifinals of the WCCA.
“I'm pretty happy,” Jolley said. “We would have liked to have one or two more kids get there, but to have six in the semis is pretty good.
“(Today) is the big day because now we want to push them through the rest of the way.”
BVA's unbeaten contingent includes top seed Nate Russo (126 pounds), second seed Adam Nickelson (182), third seeds Brendan Hasson (120), Austin Bell (160) and Nick Mayernik (220) and sixth seed Derek Verklereen (145).
“I thought our kids did a good job,” said Jolley, who noted that “Mayernik really battled well in his two matches. Today should be interesting.”
All six won two matches to reach today's semifinals.
Hasson will face second-seeded Ryan Hardaway of Kiski. Verklereen will also face a second seed, Cole Landowski, also of Kiski.
The other seven BVA wrestlers are still in play in the consolation matches and can finish as high as third place.
Yough, meanwhile, has two wrestlers in the semifinals: fourth-seeded Lucas Richardson (170), and fourth-seeded Christian Williams (195).
Yough's second-seeded Tom Sever (220) was upset by Brett Zanotto of Franklin Regional, 10-0.
Zanotto, a seventh seed, will face the Leps' Mayernik in the semifinals.
The action today begins at 9 a.m. with the consolation matches. The semifinals are set for noon with the finals to get under way at 7 p.m.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.