ShareThis Page

Burrell wrestling team collects 10th straight section title

| Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, 11:58 p.m.
Kittanning's Jacob Robb ties up Burrell's Cory Klems in the 170-pound match during the Section 3-AA wrestling tournament Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at South Allegheny. Ronald Vezzani Jr./Daily News

Not only did Burrell's wrestling team extend its streak of dominance over section opponents Wednesday night at South Allegheny High School, but the Bucs put themselves in strong position to burnish another string of achievements next week.

With victories over Avonworth and Kittanning in the Section 3-AA team tournament, Burrell (9-4) claimed its 10th consecutive section title and moved its number of section wins in a row to 78. In what was billed as an intriguing rematch with subsection B rival Kittanning (11-4), the Bucs cruised, 49-18, in the finals.

The first-place finish all but guaranteed that a No. 1 or 2 seed in next week's WPIAL Class AA team tournament will go to Burrell, the district's six-time defending champion.

“This is where we think we belong,” Burrell coach Bud Sines said. “The team that everyone is looking at is South Fayette, and you look at them on paper, and they're real solid. So you'd hate to be stuck in the No. 4 slot with them. But we took care of business.”

Burrell prevailed, 56-21, over Avonworth (5-11), subsection A's runner-up, in the semifinal, with Steven Edwards (138 pounds), Corey Falleroni (152), Zach Smith (160), Dakota DesLauriers (195) and Al Beattie (285) securing pins. Twelve of Avonworth's points came from forfeit wins.

Kittanning also advanced without much anxiety, as the Wildcats won, 51-25, over subsection A leader South Allegheny (8-4). Derek Bowser (126), Jason Nolf (138), Jacob Robb (170) and Logan Robb (220) secured pins, while Zac Croyle (195) managed a 22-5 technical fall.

The Wildcats, who lost, 35-33, to Burrell in mid-December, understood that the Bucs entered with a healthier lineup this time around — three Burrell starters (DesLauriers, 126-pounder Damon Greenwald and 120-pounder Noah Hanna) missed the regular-season match because of injury. And Kittanning lacked two starters, 182-pounder Nathan Watt and 113-pounder Brody Trumbull, who participated in the previous match.

Still, the expectation remained that Kittanning might challenge Burrell, a team that last won a section title by fewer than 10 points in 2010.

By the time Burrell's gauntlet of middleweights completed bouts, any dreams of a down-to-the-wire match had vanished. The Bucs won five of the first six bouts, with a Nolf pin at 138 being the lone result that favored Kittanning. Edwards, wrestling at 145, and Phil Marra, bumped up to 152, secured pins.

“If you're going to wrestle someone like Burrell, you better go out there and freaking wrestle,” Kittanning coach Brandon Newill said. “You can't just go out there and expect a takedown when you put in one attempt. … I just don't think we had the killer instinct.”

Kittanning's Taylor Jack (160) and Jacob Robb won back-to-back bouts, with both earning decisions. But their 3-point contributions to the team score hardly made a dent in Burrell's comfortable lead.

Pins by DesLauriers, Shane Cornuet (220) and Beattie cemented Burrell's title and left no doubt about the Bucs' eagerness to establish themselves as the WPIAL's top team.

“Once we got a nice lead, we pretty much caught fire,” Sines said. “I think we've seen that happen before.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.