Share This Page

Seniors to steel Kittanning into WPIAL team tournament

| Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2013, 1:16 a.m.
Kittanning seniors Zac Croyle (front) and Nathan Watt train together at a practice earlier this season.

In their time with Kittanning's high school wrestling program, the current seniors have witnessed the Wildcats grow from an upstart bunch into one of WPIAL Class AA's premier teams.

One of the seniors' final opportunities to push the program further arrives Wednesday.

Kittanning (11-4) begins the WPIAL Class AA team tournament at 6 p.m., when, as the No. 6 seed, it'll meet No. 11 West Greene in a first-round match at Jefferson-Morgan High School. With a win, the Wildcats will meet No. 3 Jefferson-Morgan at 7:30 p.m. in the quarterfinals.

Each of the past three seasons, Kittanning at least made the quarterfinals. In 2011, the team made its first appearance in the WPIAL semifinals, where it lost to eventual runner-up Chartiers-Houston.

Prior to the quarterfinal streak, Kittanning had just one playoff appearance — a first-round exist — dating back to 2003.

There's confidence among the Wildcats that they, even with three forfeited weight classes, can at least get back to the quarterfinals. But talk about moving beyond that round and about contending for a championship is scarce.

“We're definitely just as good as any other team, besides Burrell,” said senior Christian Emminger, who acknowledged Kittanning's struggles against the six-time defending WPIAL Class AA champion. “I think if we had a full team, we'd be contending right up there.”

At no point this season has Kittanning possessed the lineup it planned to use. Senior 126-pounder Nathan Robb suffered a season-ending shoulder injury in early December. And in the last month, senior 182-pounder Nathan Watt went down with season-ending ligament tears in his knee, and sophomore 113-pounder Brody Trumbull broke a bone in his hand.

But the Wildcats' troubles in team dual-style tournaments run deeper than that, Emminger explained. Most of Kittanning's wrestlers simply aren't prone to pinning, nor are they wired to pile up points in ways that lead to technical falls.

Of the eight team members with winning records, only two have pin totals that account for at least 50 percent of their victories. Junior 132-pounder Jason Nolf is 29-0 with 23 pins, while sophomore Logan Robb is 15-12 with 10 pins.

And Emminger and fellow seniors Taylor Jack (152 pounds) and Zac Croyle (182) are each in Kittanning's top five win leaders, but all three have earned bonus points for the Wildcats in about half of their bouts. Jack is 24-8 with 11 pins, one technical fall and one major decision. Croyle is 17-8 with eight pins, one technical fall and two major decisions. Emminger is 15-11 with five pins and two majors.

“We just don't do it,” Emminger said of pinning. “It's not that we can't. But we just don't.”

The seniors and their younger teammates know bonus points — accumulated and allowed — become critical as the competition in the WPIAL team tournament improves, especially when surrendering 18 points with forfeits.

“I've got to change the mindset right now,” coach Brandon Newill said after a 49-18 loss to Burrell in the Section 3-AA tournament. “The way we wrestled (that night) has to change; and that's something I have to change. We can't go out there and wrestle that way and expect to win, because it's not going to happen.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at wwest@tribweb.com or via Twitter at @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.