ShareThis Page

Southmoreland's Griffiths avenges loss, places 3rd in Southwest Regional

| Monday, March 4, 2013, 12:11 a.m.
Southmoreland's Austin Griffiths prevents Burgettstown's Austin McDermitt from escaping during their 106-pound third place bout at the PIAA Southwest AA Regional Wrestling Tournament on March 3, 2013 at the Cambria County War Memorial Arena in Johnstown. Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review

Southmoreland's sophomore lightweight regained his status as the better of the WPIAL's two star Austins on Saturday at the PIAA Class AA Southwest Regional championships.

Matched up with Burgettstown's Austin McDermitt for the fourth time this season and the eighth time since the start of his freshman year, 106-pounder Austin Griffiths avenged his loss to the Blue Devil in the WPIAL finals with a 6-3 victory in the regional tournament's third-place match at the Cambria County War Memorial in Johnstown.

Griffiths, who improved to 7-1 against McDermitt, secured his second regional bronze medal and advanced to the PIAA championships, which begin Thursday at Giant Center in Hershey.

“I think every match starts out even,” said Griffiths, who acknowledged he wanted a rematch. “He could come back and beat me the same way after I just beat him again. Everything has to be a new slate.”

Griffiths started the day in the semifinals, where he squared off with No. 2 seed and District 6 champion Triston Law of Forest Hills. A five-point move in the second period gave Law a 7-5 decision that dropped Griffiths to the consolation bracket.

“Austin, he got hit with a little bit of adversity,” coach Ryan Shaw said. “He got hit with a five-point move against Law, a guy he previously beat (7-0) this season. You get hit with a five-point move, and it's should've, could've, would've. We went out in the hall and regrouped, talked about getting back on track.”

An authoritative 17-0 technical fall over Chestnut Ridge's Aaron Burkett followed. The win set up the latest bout with McDermitt, who struggled to stop Griffiths' shots.

“I think he threw McDermitt off his game a little bit because for the past three days, all he worked was takedown, takedown, takedown,” Shaw said. “And in this tournament, Austin was the aggressor in every match he wrestled with takedowns, and when Austin gets a takedown, he's tough to beat, because nobody wants to be underneath him.

“You've got to be able to change right now, and that's the big thing that Griffiths did this week. He changed his style a little bit. He wasn't so predictable.”

Also headed to Hershey for Southmoreland is freshman heavyweight Jacob Beistel, who placed fifth with a 6-5 decision over Moshannon Valley's Jack Brunnell, an opponent Beistel also defeated with a pin in the tournament's opening round.

Beistel began Saturday in the consolation bracket and won his first match, 8-2, over Hope For Hyndman Charter School's Dylan Emerick. He then came just short of securing a spot in the third-place bout, as he lost to Chestnut Ridge's Austin Buttry, 2-1, in the tiebreaker portion of overtime.

“He really was upset with himself because he knew he left a golden opportunity out there on the mat and that he really didn't wrestle his best,” Shaw said.

As he did with Griffiths, Shaw spoke with his young heavyweight about the importance of focusing on the future rather than pitying the past. Beistel absorbed the advice.

“He's going to be a force to be reckoned with,” Shaw said.

“Our future is bright with those two young guys and freshman (120-pounder) Evan Myers, who was a match away from giving himself an opportunity (to make states).”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.