High school roundup: Three Kittanning wrestlers move to semis
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Three Kittanning wrestlers remain in the running for WPIAL Class AA individual titles, and four others still can earn medals and qualify for the PIAA Southwest Regional tournament.
Jason Nolf (132 pounds), Taylor Jack (152) and Zac Croyle (195) will compete in the WPIAL semifinals, which begin at 11:30 a.m. Saturday at Chartiers Valley.
Nolf, a No. 1 seed and two-time returning champion, pinned his only opponent Friday night.
Jack, a No. 2 seed, started with a pin and then won his quarterfinal, 7-4.
Croyle, a No. 2 seed, secured two pins.
Christian Emminger (126), Jacob Robb (160), Elliot Zydonik (170) and Logan Robb (220) start Saturday in the consolation brackets.
West Shamokin junior Brian Brown (145) also opens Saturday in the consolation bracket. He won his first-round match with a pinfall but lost in the quarterfinals.
District 9 — Nine Redbank Valley wrestlers advanced to the semifinals of the District 9 Class AA individual championships Saturday morning at Clarion University. Willie Gruver (113), the No. 1 seed and a defending champion, remains in the mix for gold. Other Bulldog semifinalists include Tanner Altobelli (120), Mitch Blose (126), Ty Haines (145), Cole Shirey (160), Brandon Bailey (170), Aaron Hook (182), Cal Haines (220) and Ben Carrillo (285).
Ford City 7, Baldwin 2 — Jesse Valasek scored five goals, and Eric Lindey finished with a goal and two assists for Ford City (17-2-1) in an Open Class victory.
Adam Cogley made 21 saves in net to earn the win for the Sabers, and Ryan Beerman had 22 stops for Baldwin (11-8-1).
Quaker Valley 3, Kittanning 2 (OT) — Kittanning (12-6-1) gave the defending Class A champion Quakers (20-0) a serious scare in an outdoor game at North Park.
Cameron Langham made 63 saves in net, and Cody Toy and Christian Miller scored for the Wildcats.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.