Share This Page

Burrell routs Kittanning in Shields' coaching debut

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 11:06 p.m.
Erica Dietz | Valley News Disp
Burrell's Nick Pattock attempts to control Kittanning's Cade Hepner during the 182-pound match Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, at Burrell.
Erica Dietz | Valley News Disp
Burrell's Derrick Beattie attempts to pin Kittanning's Elliot Zydonik during the 170-pound match Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, at Burrell High School.

The hearts of both Anthony Marra and Josh Shields raced a bit Wednesday as the 7 p.m. start time of Burrell wrestling's season-opening match at home against Kittanning approached.

Shields, a former Bucs assistant, awaited the start of his first official competition as Burrell's coach.

Marra, meanwhile, counted down the minutes until his varsity debut as a freshman 126-pounder.

When the time came for both to step into the spotlight, the new coach and the new face in the lineup enjoyed the moment and made sure Burrell remained Section 3-AA's frontrunner.

The seven-time WPIAL Class AA defending champion Bucs (1-0, 1-0) won nine of 12 contested weight classes during a 50-22 victory over the Wildcats (0-1, 0-1), who trailed 35-6 but closed the gap when the heavier weight classes arrived.

Marra set the tone for the night with a pin in the match's opening bout, as he turned a close contest into a bonus-point result by scoring a takedown and then pinning junior Brody Trumbull with 8 seconds left in the third period.

“I was getting butterflies, and it was just crazy,” said Marra, whose older brother, Phil, placed fourth in the PIAA last year as a senior. “Everybody told me I was going to get a pin, so that brought up my confidence. I also felt like I had to. I wish I'd done better in the first period, but it all came out good in the end.”

Marra scored a takedown with 8 seconds left in the first period to take a 2-0 lead and then rode Trumbull for the entire second period. Trumbull controlled Marra for most of the third period, but the freshman earned an escape with 19 seconds left and then went on the offensive to extend his lead and eventually secure the pin.

First-period pins by seniors J.R. Andrejcik (132 pounds), Corey Falleroni (152), Steven Edwards (160) and a 20-5 technical fall by senior Nick Pattock (182) gave Burrell a commanding lead.

Senior Jason Nolf (145), a Penn State recruit, provided Kittanning its only points through eight matches, as he pinned sophomore Jason David late in the second period.

Nolf's victory moved him into a tie with Chamie Hooks for Kittanning's all-time wins record of 137 — Hooks finished his career 137-11, and Nolf is 137-1.

Sophomore Jacob Robb (195) scored eight points in the third period during his 15-1 win, and junior Logan Robb (220) secured a pin with 10 seconds left in the first period of his bout.

Kittanning coach Brandon Newill expressed displeasure with his team.

“We know exactly who they (Burrell) are, and we know what we need to do, but we don't do it,” said Newill, who declined to explain further.

Another Burrell freshman, Dillan Jeffery, helped close out the night. The 113-pounder recorded a second-period pin in his varsity debut to conclude the match's final contested weight class; Burrell junior Jason Roberts accepted a forfeit win at 120 to end the match.

“I'm glad the first one is out of the way,” Shields said. “I was slightly nervous. Kittanning is a great team, and as you know, I'm used to wrestling, and you control that. As a coach, you depend on 14 kids, and you never know. So I'm glad the kids really showed up tonight.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.