Southmoreland off to strong start
TribLIVE Sports Videos
It's very early in the high school wrestling season, but it's OK to say Southmoreland is off to a great start. The Scotties captured their first match in Class AA, Section 2B by defeating rival Mt. Pleasant 54-30.
Cole Lambie (106 pounds), Evan Myers (132) and Brennan Coles (182) each won by fall to lead the way for Southmoreland.
Austin Griffiths (113), Anthony Wise (120), Austin Bixler (138), Sean Suter (170) and Jake Beistel (285) each won by forfeit for the Scotties.
The Scotties grabbed a bit more success on the mat with a respectable 12th place finish in the 24-team Normandy High School Wrestling Tournament in Parma Ohio this past weekend.
Griffiths captured the top slot in his weight class, while Beistel finished third, Lambie fourth and Myers eighth.
Ryan Shaw, Southmoreland wrestling coach, said the experience of the tournament was very beneficial to his young squad.
“The minimum our kids got was six matches and the maximum was nine,” Shaw said. “Even the kids that may not have done well in their eyes got on the mat seven times. Getting that experience for some of the younger wrestlers is crucial at this time of year. It's a nice way to start the season off.”
The Scotties collected their first victory Dec. 10 by outlasting McGuffey 58-38 in a nonsection game.
Michael Mucha paced Southmoreland with 18 points. Zach Stefan added 12 and Ben Niemiec chipped in with 10.
Southmoreland did fall in its Section 3-AAA opener with a 69-35 loss to Laurel Highlands. Tommy Pisula led Southmoreland with 17 points.
The girls were toppled in their Section 3-AAA opener by Indiana by a 55-21 score. Freshman Olivia Porter led Southmoreland with 13 points. They did bounce back Monday with a 45-41 win over Derry in section play. Julea Claycomb scored 14 points, and Porter added 11 for the Scotties. Rachel Garris led Derry with 12 points.
— Paul Paterra
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.