ShareThis Page

Kittanning wrestlers earn clutch victory

| Thursday, Dec. 19, 2013, 12:45 a.m.
Louis B. Ruediger | Leader Times
Kittanning's Jacob Shaner controls Valley's Sequawon Harris in the 106-pound match Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2013, at Kittanning High School. Shaner won by pin at 5:22.
Louis B. Ruediger | Leader Times
Valley's Chris O'Sullivan holds a wrist as Kittanning's Nick Croyle attempts to escape during the 138-pound match Wednesday December 18, 2013
Louis B. Ruediger | Leader Times
Valley's Dylan Clarke rolls Kittanning's Elliot in to a pin during the 170 pound match at Kittanning High School. Clarke's win gave the Viking's a 5 point lead. Wednesday December 18, 2013

With a spot in the section playoffs potentially on the line, Kittanning and Valley produced a playoff-like match.

Jacob Shaner and Brendon Malia won with pins in the last two contested bouts, and Kittanning needed every point to hold on for a Section 3B-AA win over Valley, 40-39, on Wednesday in Kittanning.

“It's always a big one against Valley. Those guys wrestle so hard, and every year it seems like it's a fight right to the end,” Kittanning coach Brandon Newill said. “We were lucky to get a win. We had some guys out, and it didn't look good for us going in, but our guys fought so hard to win it.”

Shaner stepped on the mat for the 106-pound bout with his team trailing 33-28 and knowing that the Wildcats (1-1, 1-1) were going to concede six points by forfeiting the bout at 120. He came through with a third-period pin of Sequawon Harris at the 5:22 mark to put Kittanning ahead 34-33.

Malia then needed to follow suit in his match at 113 against Calvin Louttit, and he did so in similar fashion. Malia chose the down position to start the third period, but he quickly scored a reversal and got the winning fall at the 4:37 mark.

“To need two pins, back-to-back, with little guys like that is tough,” Newill said. “For them to come up with that is huge. It's great to get a thrilling victory like that in front of your home crowd.”

Valley (1-1, 1-1) took a 27-16 lead after the middle weight classes on three straight pins by Noah Kankoski (160), Dylan Clarke (170) and Terrell Fields (182).

The Vikings needed a bigger advantage as they forfeited bouts to Kittanning's Jacob Robb and Dave Grafton at 195 and 285, which allowed the Wildcats back in.

Kittanning got its early points on a 9-1 major decision by Nick Croyle (138), an injury default win for Jason Nolf (145) and a pin by Nate Vukovich (152), and the Vikings knew that would make a comeback difficult.

“You can't give up bonus points in matches like this,” Valley coach Steve Ansani said. “We told those (lightweight) kids to try and hang on, but it wasn't them, it was earlier matches, too. We shouldn't have been on our backs, but we're going to go back to the drawing board and take care of that.”

Valley also got wins by fall from Partick DeWitt (132) and Marcus Davenport (220). Jihad Ratliff won a 9-5 decision at 126 for Valley, and Zaya Dixon got the forfeit win at 120.

The win gives Kittanning an important head-to-head edge in the section standings as the teams are now tied for second place with two section matches remaining.

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.