Share This Page

DeAugustino Wrestling Classic at West Mifflin wide open

| Thursday, Dec. 26, 2013, 10:36 p.m.

After Bermudian Springs claimed five straight Steve DeAugustino Holiday Wrestling Classic titles at West Mifflin from 2005-09, the event has been a model of parity since.

The 2013 edition looks to be no different.

“I would imagine it's going to be real competitive at the top five or six places,” West Mifflin wrestling coach Tony Salopek said. “It doesn't seem to me like any of the teams are really going to run away with it that I can tell. I would think that there's some balance at the top end.”

The last three team champions — North Hills, host West Mifflin and Upper St. Clair — return to the mat this year from Dec. 27 and 28, along with 28 other teams hoping to claim the tournament title.

While this year's field is wide open, defending champion North Hills looks like one of the squads in the mix for a title.

The Indians feature two individual champions from last season in 106-pounder Gage Curry and 160-pounder Jonathan Avon.

“They have some pretty good top end wrestlers and then they're pretty solid,” Salopek said.

North Hills topped last year's top five, followed by Belle Vernon, South Fayette, Plum and Mt. Lebanon. Of that group, only North Hills and Plum return, but the tournament has added several new teams to round out a strong field with some of the top wrestlers in the area.

“It's nice to be able to provide a place where we can have that kind of competition and it's nice for our kids to get that kind of competition and not have to travel,” Salopek said.

The event begins with weigh-ins at 8:30 a.m. Friday followed by the opening, initial consolation and quarterfinal rounds. The tournament will conclude Saturday with later consolation rounds, semifinals and championship finals, which are estimated to begin at 5 p.m.

Alex Oltmanns is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.